Reply #19: I already anticipated that that's what you were getting at [View All]

[RayUbinger]

and I already quoted argumentation against it:

"The volume and density of these trails cannot be explained as the streaming away of dust that was somehow clinging to the columns of the outer walls at the moment of collapse, which would quickly dissipate as the pieces began to fall.

"The fact that the dust streams so exactly follow the contours of the wall fragments strongly implies that the dust is being generated from the steel columns themselves. he pulling along of dust in the wake of falling pieces ... would involve dust being pulled into an area of low pressure and would create characteristic eddies behind the pieces. The dust in these pictures is flowing out, away from the pieces<.>"

http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/dust%20trails/

You ignored this part of the article, if you even read any of the article at all. By the way the author, Plaguepuppy aka Jeffrey King, is an M.D. as well as an MIT-trained engineer.


Before 9/11, solid steel in midair freefall was never known to behave this way (fizzing to dust like an Alka-Seltzer falling through water). Afterward, here's what it looked like under magnification:

http://thewebfairy.com/911/steel/

This indicates principles of physics not known to the public.


Ray Ubinger
http://911foreknowledge.com