Question for those who believe in Mihop... [View All]

[mikelewis]

I believe that someone other than UBL was responsible for 9/11. I believe the government not only knew about the plot, but were instrumental in it's design and orchestrating the barriers to a successful defense against the attack. My question is concerning George Bush.

If he and his cronies were the ones who planned and orchestrated the attacks, why wasn't there a clear connection created linking Iraq to the attacks? It has been reported that immediately after the attack, he ordered the intelligence services to "find a link to Iraq". If he was the one responsible, wouldn't that link have been established at the time of attack?

Look at the Oklahoma City Bombing, I believe that the Murray building bombing was designed to trigger a war between the united States and Iraq. The reports concerning the links to the Iraqi Nationals involvement, though clearly false, give the impression that someone wanted Clinton to blame Iraq and then invade. The same thing occurs in the Cole Bombing. The Christian Science Monitor wrote an article linking the Cole to Iraq, though again, the link is weak and was never publicized as credible. These two events raise different issues and I am not really trying to side-track the issue. These two issues are presented to show that some intelligence perspectives viewed Iraq as a possibility for these attacks. Whether or not the information was inteded to trigger a war with Iraq is irrelevant to this question. I would like some input on these 2 attacks and ideas why someone would want to pin the wrap on Iraq.

If Bush was involved in the planning for 9/11, why wasn't there proof of Iraqi involvement? This, in no way, absolves him from the conspiracy charge, I'm only trying to find out who planned it and why.

Again, this question is for the Mihop crowd.