You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oswald and Oliver Stone's "JFK" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 09:39 AM
Original message
Oswald and Oliver Stone's "JFK"
Advertisements [?]
The movie paints a pretty clear picture of a conspiracy, and that Oswald was an intel agent and patsy.

Of course there are detractors. I'm sure there are people here who think the movie is total bull. Here, I would like to focus on Oswald and I would like to know specific things that the movie got wrong about Oswald. I don't want to get into physical evidence of the shots. I want to discuss Oswald as a creature of the intel agencies.

Even the official story of Oswald is darn strange:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_harvey_oswald

this is guy is very suspicious, to say the least:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_de_Mohrenschildt

but the movie pulls out a lot more than what is in wikipedia.

Back to Stone's "JFK"-- according to wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JFK_movie
Vincent Bugliosi was a big critic of the movie.

In this article, http://hnn.us/articles/41490.html
Bugliosi says he has 53 reasons why Oswald is the assassin, then he lists 5 reasons-- presumably he thinks these are good reasons:

"Oswald’s Mannlicher-Carcano rifle was the murder weapon. That’s pretty heavy by itself. Oswald was the only employee at the Book Depository Building who fled the building after the assassination. Forty-five minutes later, he shoots and kills Officer J. D. Tippit, Dallas Police Department. That murder bore the signature of a man in desperate flight from some awful deed. Thirty minutes later at a Texas theatre he resists arrest, pulls a gun on the arresting officer. During his interrogation, told one provable lie after another, showing a consciousness of guilt."

Seriously? Only one semi-direct piece of evidence-- the rifle? And even that could have been easily framed. The other pieces of evidence are very circumstantial, and can be explained in other ways.

Was Oswald involved in the assassination in some way? Almost certainly. But did he act alone? That is the key question. There seems to be plenty of involvement of Oswald with intel-connected shady characters. What I would like to know if the movie has any facts wrong about Oswald's connection to David Ferrie, his bizarre movements from Russia and back, the strange response of the US govt, the timing of the U2 shootdown, and so forth.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC