You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: So.... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. So....
After looking through your links, I will ask again... Anything at all to back up these claims?

"Kroll was responsible for the whole security of the World Trade Center in 2001."

"kroll is part of the intelligence community and most definately had an officer in the room available for employee announcements, with direct orders to tell people to go back to their offices"

"Kroll O'Gara (former Kroll Associates, Inc), who is responsible for the security of all US-presidents since 1945."

"Kroll did business with the Company which retrieved data from these hard drives processing the transactions. Probably to further their espionage/spy agenda!"

The only one of these claims that kind-of sort-of gets backed up is the last one, and that by a wiki reference that has no cite... not the most reliable.

Also, these disprove claim 1 % 2:

"Kroll were responsible for revamping security at the World Trade Center after the 1993 World Trade Center bombing"

"Kroll did in part manage evacuation on Sept 11:

Another home-based client was the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which hired Kroll after the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. Kroll was credited with the Port Authority's ability to evacuate the majority of the towers' workers after the first plane hit on September 11, 2001, and before the buildings collapsed."

Are you reading what your putting here? It is pretty clear that the Port Authority managed the evacuation, Kroll helped out coming up with a plan in case it was needed. Revamping security in 93 does not translate to running evacuation in 01.

Thanks though for the PM letting me know you had come up with some links, let me know if you come up with any that put some weight behind the claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC