It's Hard to Believe People Here Are Still Arguing Against Demolition of the WTC [View All]

[spooked911]

If one thing has been firmly established about the 9/11 plot, it is that the three WTC towers were blown up with powerful explosives.

I have been posting here a long time -- since mid-2004. I became seriously interested in 9/11 in 2003-2004, started reading everything I could around that time. I always had doubts about the 9/11 official story, but it wasn't until I read Griffin's "New Pearl Harbor" book that I felt like I was on to something real. Although, in all honesty, I wasn't convinced by the book-- I thought there wasn't smoking gun evidence. And I was actually very skeptical about the idea that the WTC was blown up. But I also remember thinking that if it could be shown that the towers were blown up, then that would be clear evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. I read several more books at that point, I started my 9/11-themed blog, I did my own research and I learned a lot about the demolition of the WTC towers. I got very motivated to do something about what I consider the massive scam of 9/11. And that was just the beginning, I have learned so much more in the past three years. The important thing I learned was that 9/11 wasn't done in isolation, but was merely the most recent and most egregious of a long line of conspiracies against ordinary Americans. Just following the news over the last few years, it soon becomes clear that the official stories for all sorts of events are obviously false, and that we Americans are constantly being fed propaganda by our government. The media are complicit in this too. This should be clear. We should automatically distrust official stories-- particularly in matters of war and "national security".

By now, it should be clear to anyone who has looked into the matter and who has an ounce of wisdom about the world that the WTC towers didn't undergo simple "collapses". There are so many lines of evidence that the towers must have been blown up, I don't see a need to rehash it here. But the clearest reason that demolition must be the case is how woefully inadequate the official collapse story is at explaining the full devastation of the towers. The fact is that demolition of the WTC towers is a better explanation for their destruction than collapse-- it is by far the better hypothesis.

Obviously, there is a very vocal cohort of posters here who make it their mission to deny any notion of 9/11 being an inside job, including denying the demolition of the towers-- to ridiculous lengths of denial. How many people who believe 9/11 was an inside job have come here to this board, and gotten totally turned off, turned away, frustrated by the steadfast and ever present denial and mockery of the OCT supporters? The OCTists even have an expressed agenda-- to "protect" the Democratic party from "crazy" conspiracy theories. For some reason, the OCTists ignore that the powers that pulled off 9/11 are in fact powerful enemies of everything Democrats (supposedly) stand for. Think of how much better the world would be if the evil, elite masters of war were exposed, if the war criminals were brought to justice, and if the insane foreign wars were stopped-- and had never even been started. Peace and justice are Democratic ideals to me, and I truly resent people shutting me and my brethren out of the conversation-- and shutting down discussion of 9/11 being the highest order of treason. The OCTists are expert at mockery and picking at details, and consistently act oblivious to the larger, well-documented, conspiratorial picture of the world.

The mainstream media is excellent at covering up conspiracies, and promoting propaganda-- why do we need this here at DU?