You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #31: Allow me to outline my idea [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-02-04 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Allow me to outline my idea
I'll keep this deliberately brief.

1. Make the NICS checks available to private individuals.

2. A person who wants to sell a gun _may_ use NICS to check the background of a prospective buyer.

- Seller pays a small fee.

- Buyer provides same data required by dealers.

- Buyer gets a snail-mail notification that he or she has been checked and who performed the check. This will discourage use of the system for other than intended purposes.

- Performing a check under false pretenses would be a misdemeanor.

3. If the buyer comes up clean, seller gets a confirmation number (similar to what dealers get) and definitive defense against prosecution in the event the buyer turns out to be a prohibited person who slipped through the cracks.

4. If seller elects _not_ to perform check on a buyer, seller can be charged with providing a gun to a prohibited person (e.g. felon) if the buyer is a prohibited person and the transaction comes to the attention of authorities.

This system would address several problems apparent in other proposals to "close the gun-show loophole":

- Addresses all private sales, not just ones conducted at gun shows.

- Allows sellers to transfer guns to well-known friends, relatives, etc. without going through the hassle and expense of a background check,

- Protects everyone's privacy and confidentiality,

- Does not create a gun registry (which kills the idea in the minds of the most zealous gun-grabbers),

- Does not put the federal government in the position of regulating private, intrastate transfers of ordinary personal property (for which it would have arguably no Constitutional authority),

- Does not require involvement of an FFL holder. Dealers typically charge a fee for private-party transfers or consignment sales,

- Would not interfere with existing state systems that do not use NICS, e.g. California where all transactions go through FFL holders.

I've gotten all kinds of different responses to this idea including "WHO GIVES A FLYING FUCK?", "Yeah, surrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrre", and "As a seller I prefer to keep buyers fully at arm's length; I will not be accountable for their criminal activity", etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC