What Your Candidate Needs To Do To Beat Bush [View All]

[Tim The Enchanter]

I would like a thread that abstains from bashing each other's candidates. Instead, I would like DU'ers to voice what it is they believe their candidates need to do to beat George Bush. None of the candidates are perfect, and even those that come close (like Kucinich) do have other areas to work on. I would like to read some constructive criticism, and I believe that would come best from the supporters. I believe all of these candidates have a chance, and I will support whoever gets the nomination because they are all Democrats. Despite voting records, waffling and other undesirable features we bash each other over, any one of these candidates will be surrounded by great minds and will have the country's best interests at heart when in the White House.

I am currently a Dean supporter, but I am keeping my eye on everyone. In my mind, Dean needs to "lay it out" soon. I think he should be up front about his inconsistencies and present a comprehensive platform in a public (not over-the-top stump speeches). I realize that sounds a little idealistic and politically risky, but it would solidify my support for him. I want him to articulate where he stands and to acknowledge his missteps along the campaign trail. That is what I am looking for in a president- someone who is human (which George Bush is apparently not). Also, I would like Dean's debating skills to be honed, because, to be honest, I feel just about every other candidate (especially Kerry) could tan his hide. Dean has been lucky so far, and I am looking for someone who will tear GW a new * next fall.

Well, that's my input for now. I would like to hear from other supporters who have constructive criticism of their own candidates. Thank you.