You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #45: Definitely NOT too sensitive. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-15-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
45. Definitely NOT too sensitive.
Edited on Thu Dec-15-05 02:22 PM by BlueIris
"It’s not a discrimination thing, it’s just a natural, straight guy thing."

'Kay. I know lots of straight people who naturally wouldn't be "grossed out" by the site of homoeroticism or gay sex. "(N)atural straight guy thing." What an asshole.

Also--it's nearly 2006. He's never watched any piece of art or entertainment with gay sex in it before? How limited. And immature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC