You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: Semi-HR type here. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. Semi-HR type here.
No matter what else you do, go to the immediate boss, the one who would evaluate your work, and ask for a 3-month evaluation (written, with both of you signing it). DO NOT mention any pay raise when you ask for this. A few days after you have the good eval in your hot little hand, ask the same boss, or the HR guy, about the promised raise. Your immediate boss may have simply forgotten to do the paperwork. You would know better than I what kind of person he is.

But the HR person not returning calls. . .nasty.

Paychecks also lag by one pay cycle. Look at the dates you were paid for (not the date of the check) to see if you are totally in that "past-the-3-month" window. If not, you may want to wait one more paycheck before you freak out.

I also agree that the "should" is a way for them to deny your raise, but you will have some ammo to fight that if you have a good review in your hand. Then you can ask them, "well, what the hell is the "should" part of this document referring to?" And innocently explain that it implies that a good review would get you a raise. Which it does imply, or the word would be meaningless. If they are nasty and can think on their feet, they will say the "should" just refers to whether the company is able to give out any raises at that time, etc., etc. Hope that is not the case. I hope they hem and haw and pay you off to keep you quiet. But they will be happy to not give you a raise as long as you let them get away with it. Sad to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC