You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm so pissed!! Is this blatantly sexist, or what?! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 04:14 PM
Original message
I'm so pissed!! Is this blatantly sexist, or what?!
Advertisements [?]
Our local community bank recently got bought out by a bigger bank, and during the upcoming conversion time of switching over, we have been told to make alternative arrangements for any electronic transfers scheduled for the 13th-24th of this month. Fine. I call our insurance company to make arrangements for them to schedule our two monthly draft payments to be taken out 10 days earlier, for this month only. I give them all the account info they need, provide my s.s. #, etc.... Everything is fine, for MY policy payment.

BUT.....it turns out I need to have MrShine call in, himself, to authorize the same thing for HIS monthly draft payment. In other words, even though I am his wife of 15 yrs and even though I can provide all the necessary required acct and social sec. #s and "proof" of who he is and what we want, they need to hear from him that it is OK to proceed with this request.

Mind you, they don't require anything in writing to verify this, they are fully satisfied with simply hearing a MALE voice, indentifying himself as MrShine, giving them all the required number info they need.

I could literally pull some guy off the street and have him recite all the appropriate acct info on my behalf and they would be fully satisfied and have NO WAY of knowing if it was really him, in the first place! :crazy:

When I pointed out the absurdity of it to the rep, she passed me over to her supervisor, who made the lame argument that it was all about preventing "identity theft" and if the situation were reversed, he'd be having to go through the same thing. Yeah, thanks. THAT really clears it up for me. :eyes: The sexism goes BOTH ways.

The whole thing is just so ridiculously lame and it infuriates me. :grr: I wasted half an hour of my time, being on hold, explaining the situation, only to be told we have to call back to make arrangements for his policy payment. When I complained to the supervisor about the time I'd spent and how MrShine will now have to take time out of his busy day to deal with this shit, she offered me up her personal and direct number (oh boy!) so he can hopefully move things along more expeditiously.

Keep in mind, this is NOT high finance or political intrigue we're talking about here. This is about making a fucking arrangement for them to get paid 10 days earlier than they normally do. Insane. :grr:

:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC