You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I saw the new Bond movie today, I wasn't impressed *spoilers* [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-25-06 05:21 AM
Original message
I saw the new Bond movie today, I wasn't impressed *spoilers*
Advertisements [?]
I'd heard rave reviews from both critics and my friends who but it disappointed me. It certainly wasn't the worst bond movie but it had some serious issues.

I'll start with what I liked...

I liked the development of Bond's character that hasn't really been done in previous movies. Making the story more personal was a good twist and I hope they continue to do this in the future movies. Also, I thought the actors gave good performances particularly Judy Dench who I've always liked as M.

What I didn't like...

The movie was not faithful to the Bond franchise in so many ways. There villain didn't have a super weapon with the intent to blow something up, there was no car chase scene with Bond's car shooting missiles. There was no Q in the movie and there were really no gadgets at all. If this were any other Bond movie, Q would've given Bond X-ray sunglasses so that he could see the cards of the other players' cards.

Which brings me to the poker game. People don't play Texas Hold 'Em for $150 million. People with that much money play more exotic games like Baccarat. The Texas Hold 'Em game was obviously put in the movie because everybody knows how it is played except that it missed the poker craze by about two years.

Finally, I didn't dislike Daniel Craig's performance but I don't like the way they've portrayed him as Bond. Pierce Brosnan and all of the Bond actors before him that I can remember had a hairy chest and a gut. Bond isn't supposed to have rock hard abs and chizzled arms. If he did, he'd be spending 5 hours in the gym every day instead of saving the world. They took every opportunity they could to take shots of Bond with his shirt off.

Now I realize that this could be perceived as hypocritical considering that the women in these movies have always been sex objects and the bond girls generally are unrealistically portrayed. But I'd much rather make the women more realistic than turn Bond into a sex object as well.

What did everyone else who has seen it think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC