You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Subdivision names- why are they so lame- why do they need? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 07:08 PM
Original message
Subdivision names- why are they so lame- why do they need?
Advertisements [?]
Harbor pointe, Berkshire, the govoners club ect......

Whats up with having some kind of sign with a lame name on it at these subdivisions? The snobbier sounding the better it seems to me. One near where I work, "the village at ...." it ain't no freaking village, its row after row of similar looking houses on 1/8 acre lots with no trees and a brand new SUV parked out front. You never see people (gasp) outdoors, no kids playing, no village feel at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC