8. They use that to set up the first half of a sentence that they use as
their "proof" of Wilson's "lack of credibility".
When you hear the bush* apologists call in they always start out with "Wilson is descredited, his wife recommended his trip".
They leave out that while she may/may not have put his name in the hat or even talked about his experience in the area, she had NO ability to AUTHORIZE the trip. And even if she DID have that ability what the hell does that matter with their treasonous act of revealing her identity?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
