You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #49: Compromise is not necessarily a sign of cowardice [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
aaronnyc Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. Compromise is not necessarily a sign of cowardice
As a minority Party in a two party system, we have no choice but to compromise when the opportunity presents itself. If we had allowed the Repubs to get rid of the filibuster, we wouldn't have had any ground to stand on the future; the GOP would have controlled everything. I would have been furious if DNC leadership had allowed the filibuster to die, because they were too concerned with standing on principle.

BTW, I think the fact that the right-wing of the GOP hates the deal is indicative of the fact that we did not cave in to the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC