Reply #47: for example .... [View All]

[Pepperbelly]

on the LIHOP and the MIHOP area, I have followed the evidence as it has developed and have seen the good rough outlines of what it takes to prove something. A conclusion is only a aha!-moment after looking at the facts.

For example, as Mopaul noted above, re: the immediate "identification" of the hijackers was so very odd. It struck me immediately as not something that seemed plausible. It is diffiuclt enough in a small, controlled environment to come up with this-is-what-happened information even within a week or two of an incident not comparing to 9-11 in magnitude or complexity. And information has developed that supports the speculation.

I evaluate as I come across data. That's all any of us can do.