You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Some good reasons here [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Some good reasons here
http://www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=397

<snip>

Despite demurring in March over the prospect of a CIA job, it seems that Goss changed his mind as the months wore on. That he did “not want” the CIA post, however, seems to have little to do with his own concerns over his qualifications; in actual fact, he seems to have his sights set on a much bigger goal – the proposed new office of “intelligence czar:”

“…In June, Goss proposed making the CIA director the intelligence czar, with control over the CIA, responsibility for advising the president and budget authority over all 15 U.S. intelligence agencies. Critics dubbed his legislation the ‘CIA takeover bill.’ The 9/11 Commission said the three jobs are too much for one official.

Given his relationship with Bush and his views about empowering the CIA chief, it is unlikely that Goss would have said yes to the job only to have a more powerful intelligence official between himself and Bush. White House spokesman Scott McClellan did not rule out the possibility that Goss would eventually become the intelligence czar.”

Oh, now that’s a great idea – give a 65 year-old man with language and computer skills appropriate for the World War II era an intelligence post of unprecedented power in 2004 America. It becomes especially scary when considering that one of the first worries over such a post is a potential lack of accountability on the part of the czar who, after all, would have to answer only to the president. If that president is good buddy Bush, we can say goodbye to any thought of accountability.

...lots more..
http://www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=397
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC