Reply #26: More Ammo: [View All]

[John_H]

1)One major demand we make is Terry McAulliffe getting the first response, unopposed, just seconds after Chimp's speech, the same way Mr. Ed did after Kerry's speech.

2) During the Iowa caususes Newsnight ran a piece about Dems planning to vote for bush--when I complained A. Brown sent me the following email.

"If there is a real story about a split in the party we will absolutely. This is not about one guy or a few people. It is about a trend in american politics. That was the premise and I don't see that trend on the other side yet and I suspect you don't either. But if it is there it will be done."

When I pointed out to him:

"I assume you haven’t seen any of the many “real” stories, such as the following Reuters and New York Times pieces: http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=5831134&src=rss/ElectionCoverage
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40715FF3D580C718EDDAB0894DC404482

Did you miss the before-the-end-of-the-convention Zogby poll which shows Dems ahead by 2 in the South? Tough to do that without GOP votes. Even Lunz’s MSNBC focus group contained a number of Republicans planning to vote for Kerry."

Of cource, no reply--and no story.

3)Wolf blitzer's continual repetition of RW smaear talking points--
To the ones listed in the excellent DU front page piece, add the one Krugman wrote aout--his repeating that Richard Clarke was mentally unstable.

4)Bill Scnieder, Bill Schnieder, Bill Shnieder.