You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #53: actually he was probably married [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
daveskilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #40
53. actually he was probably married
Edited on Fri Feb-27-04 12:04 PM by daveskilt
The account of him being in the temple at age 12 would have been his barmitzvah which at that time among his sect included betrothal to a future spouse in an arrangemed marriage.

He begins his ministry at age 30 which is the time when he could first have become a rabbi - in fact he is called rabbi many times, at that time he could not have been a rabbi without being married.

He calls out lazarus daughter when she is in mourning. women at that time were required to stay in mourning until their husband or family patriarch called them from the home.

The responsibility to provide wine at a wedding resided solely with the bridegroom - when his mother asked him where the wine was at cana it would have been highly inappropriate if he were not the bridegroom.

He is annointed with oil prior to burial by mary and martha. This ritual was only permissable by either the wife of the deceased or his trusted male companions. If Jesus were not married - peter james and john would have done this.

Josephus hints that one of the reasons he was persecuted was his belief in polygamy (josephus says marriage like david and solomon)

It is a pretty safe bet that he was married, but along with a lot of other things was taken out of the collection of writings that became the bible through many translations and transcriptions over the centuries. (like all the references to female prophets that started to dissappear in Paul's time and really got ripped out in the time of Elizabeth the first when the idea of female religious power became pretty noxious to a male pope threatened by the first protestant church in England now headed by - a woman)

Now there is far less credible evidence that at least one of his apostles was gay ...possible but not so likely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC