You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #17: 1931? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. 1931?
I'm sorry, but politicians in the 1930's of the developed world decided that tit-for-tat protectionism was a good thing and the result was anything but. The tariff rises of the 1930's deepened the global depression of the time and after the end of WWII the GATT was created in order to prevent such an economic depression from happening again.

Not only is your quote dated but the protectionist pratice of the time was a complete faliure. Come to think of it, so was $hrubya's recent attempt with the steel tarriffs. Here is an old DU article on that matter that may be of interest.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/02/03/13_trade.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC