Reply #39: It's a "Subliminable" message for the masses [View All]

[JohnyCanuck]

The great and powerful war-time leader Dubya is really not as important as you thought. He's really just a slightly overgrown midget. Where'd you get off imagining he was all that great anyway?

Now if Bush flubs the interview tomorrow and we see more pictures and propaganda/brainwashing techniques which could be understood as means of subliminally diminishing the importance of the Shrub, it could be more evidence that Mike Ruppert was right in his predictions last year that the Shrub had served his purpose in getting the US military into Iraq and would be removed either in the upcoming 2004 elections or by impeachment shortly afterwards. According to Ruppert, once bases are established in Iraq (as has long been planned) the US could exert the control it sorely wants over the world's most important oil fields, and, what's more, under Dubya's "presidency" the corporate crooks and war profiteers are more deeply entrenched in the system than ever. Now that the original goals have been accomplished or are substantially on the way to being accomplished, Shrub is damaged goods and will be replaced with a new leader who can take advantage of the geo-political/strategic gains under Shrub (control of oil) without outwardly appearing to be a war mongering, sock puppet of rich corporations and the oil and defense industries (like the Shrub is now widely perceived to be).

Beyond Bush Part 1

Beyond Bush Part 2


Excerpt from Beyond Bush Part 1.

July 1, 2003 1600 PDT (FTW) -- Let's just suppose for a moment that George W. Bush was removed from the White House. Cheney, Powell, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, Wolfowitz and Rove too. What would that leave us with? It would leave us stuck in hugely expensive, Vietnam-like guerrilla wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It would leave us with the Patriot Act, Homeland Security and Total Information Awareness snooping into every detail of our lives. It would leave us with a government in violation of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th and 8th Amendments to the Constitution. It would leave us with a massive cover-up of US complicity in the attacks of 9/11 that, if fully admitted, would show not intelligence "failures" but intelligence crimes, approved and ordered by the most powerful people in the country. It would leave us with a government that now has the power to compel mass vaccinations on pain of imprisonment or fine, and with no legal ability to sue the vaccine makers who killed our friends or our children. It would leave us with two and half million unemployed; the largest budget deficits in history; more than $3.3 trillion missing from the Department of Defense; and state and local governments broke to the point of having to cut back essential services like sewers, police, and fire. It would leave us with a federal government that had hit the debt ceiling and was unable to borrow any more money. And we would still be facing a looming natural gas crisis of unimagined proportions, and living on a planet that is slowly realizing that it is running out of oil with no "Plan B". Our airports however, would be very safe, and shares of Halliburton, Lockheed and DynCorp would be paying excellent dividends.

This is not good management.

Leaving all of these issues unaddressed is not good management either.

And this is why, as I will demonstrate in this article, the decision has already been made by corporate and financial powers to remove George W. Bush, whether he wants to leave or not, and whether he steals the next election or not. Before you start cheering, ask yourself three questions: "If there is someone or something that can decide that Bush will not return, nor remain for long, what is it? And if that thing is powerful enough to remove Bush, was it not also powerful enough to have put him there in the first place? And if that is the case, then isn't that what's really responsible for the state of things? George W. Bush is just a hired CEO who is about to be removed by the "Board of Directors". Who are they? Are they going to choose his replacement? Are you going to help them?

Many, if not most of you are thinking this is way too :tinfoilhat: for me, especially when you're talking about subliminal messages in photographs. However, the more I see the things going around us today (weird diseases breaking out, mysterious deaths of numerous prominent microbiologists, a suspicious "suicide" of a prominent WMD expert, interest in Peak Oil mounting, the crackdown on civil liberties along with the militarization of police forces under the guise of fighting the war on terror etc.), the more I am coming to believe that Ruppert and others like him are more correct than incorrect in their assesment of the situation.