You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #53: I beg to differ [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
dpibel Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-31-04 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
53. I beg to differ
So, I think, would your avatar.

You have described the slavery of fear. If freedom is defined, as it is in modern America, as the freedom to choose a Ford instead of a Chevrolet, but you must be fearfully tied to the job those kind rich folk "give" you, then it's not much freedom at all.

Not all jobs can be outsourced (although many can). There are 300 million Americans. Legalizing a few million folk who cross the border to do stoop labor and keep clean the houses and lawns of LA and Houston and Phoenix could not offset the effects of a general strike.

Most importantly: They can't outsource consumption. That's where the American propagandized analytic breaks down. We've been trained to see it as a question of losing our jobs. In reality, if we all stocked up on a few weeks of food and walked off our jobs and out of the stores we'd see our true power. And I know that some people can't buy two weeks ahead on food. That's why some of us would have to help our neighbors.

Americans are trained from birth that they have no power beyond a quadrennial jaunt to the ballot box and no freedom other than the choice of brands (which freedom is vociferously defended by advocates of one or another).

In fact, we do power the whole economic engine. We provide the sweat and the skills and we give all the money back.

It's axiomatic that those who rule do so only with the consent of the ruled. Once that consent is gone, rule breaks down.

Don't think it's possible? Check out the Seattle general strike. For that matter, check out Ghandi's salt march, and the other instances where Ghandi convinced great masses of people to simply withdraw their consent.

The odd thing about this is, when you suggest this sort of economic action, people say, "But people will lose their jobs! People will suffer."

Guess what. People are losing their jobs. People are suffering.

People should do something. Better, people should do nothing. What're they going to do? Send out the National Guard to make people shop?

Do I think this will ever happen? Not in fear-based America. Do I think it would work? I surely do.

This is not a precise quote, but it's close, from Giovanni Ettor, one of the IWW organizers who was jailed for his work in the textile strikes:

"All the workers need to do to bring things to a halt is cross their arms."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC