You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #34: LOL . . . a peer reviewed study? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-16-05 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. LOL . . . a peer reviewed study?
Edited on Fri Dec-16-05 06:41 AM by ET Awful
What a load of horseshit.

Not everything is peer-reviewed. (Also, a peer-reviewed study is performed in a medical or scientific context, where there are peers to review it, it's not typically performed in a statistical context, do you ask for a peer review of an AP/IPSOS poll?)

Sorry if you can't find information for yourself. I provided you with a starting point.

The numbers come from folks like Barbara Becnel, not myself. If you don't like them, talk to her.

Of course, if you'd done any research, you'd know that Williams didn't have "connections." Becnel despised him when she met him. She went in to write a book on her own as a journalist.

12 year old kids don't write affidavits. Ask Becnel (or hell, read court filings with letters from kids attached for that matter).

Until then, you're spewing your opinions based on nothing but your opinions.

Until you're willing to speak with Becnel or contact her (I have in the past), you have no clue what you're talking about. So, until you actually educate yourself, you aren't worth speaking with.

As I said, you've oviously never worked with at-risk youth. You've never seen the reaction among kids when they see someone from their own background (instead of some sanctimonious prick in a suit) telling them the dangers. He didn't just write books (you'd know this also if you'd done any research). He recorded videos which were used worldwide, he engaged in conference phone calls with youth centers across the country, some of them on a weekly basis. He held programs inside the prison where extremely at-risk youth were introduced to what it was like (much like the Scared Straight programs used in the 70's which were found to be very effective).

Once again, I don't believe you've done ANY research into the subject. Tell you what, write to Becnel, ask her for her back-up. She's provided it to the court and to others, I'm sure that she'd provide it to you as well.

Maybe you'd like to speak with the president of the National Lawyers Guild?

http://www.nlg.org/news/statements/TookiePR.htm

How about the president of the San Francisco Board of Education?

http://edjustice.blogspot.com/2005/11/educators-for-tookie-williams-books.html

Of course there's also the fact that the 9th Circuit when they reviewed his case recommended clemency. (will post the exact text of their recommendation later, don't have it handy right now.)

Then of course you could read:

http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/gasper181105.html

Or do you really not want to know the facts? Maybe stay secure in your haze of moral indignation?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC