Reply #7: First of all, the opening of your scenario would be a lie [View All]

[mikehiggins]

from the outset. There would be NO Iranian attack AND Bush wouldn't give a rat's ass how many "brave 'muricans" got wasted in the war. They all are, after all, volunteers.

So, what is the other question? Oh, yeah. A major power attacks and destroys US interests in the Pacific AND invades Asia AND Australia in alliance with a genocidal maddog regime in Europe, costs the world millions of innocent lives, destroys entire populations and looks to cost the US hundreds of thousands of additional American lives BECAUSE the militarists running their show refuse to accept any sort of defeat or surrender acceptable to their enemies.

So Truman nukes 'em, the Emporer finds his cojones and the war ends.

And you have a problem with that?

You compare George Bush to HST? The neocon imperialism to WWII?

In my opinion, that is just lame, lame, lame.

I'm sorry so many Japanese were killed in the A-bombings but there is no doubt in my mind that if they had those weapons they would have used them against us, just as the Nazis would have. It was a war, after all, not a tea-party.