You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #41: fraudulent docs undermind story [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
funnymanpants Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #29
41. fraudulent docs undermind story
If you try to prove something with a lie then you look like a fool. I've followed this story very closely and after looking at all the evidence cannot help concluding that the documents are forged. I think DUer's should really consider the evidence so they don't get caught.

Although all the features such as superscript and proportional fonts existed on typerwritters during the time, *all these features did not exist on one typewritter.* This is why the freepers are offering something like 10,000 bucks for anyone who can reproduce the documents on a typewritter. On the other hand, one can type the documents in MS Word and get essentially a perfect copy. What are the odds that a machine over 30 years ago would have the exact same leading (space between lines) and kearning (space between letters) as Word uses? Moreover, the heading for the docs is perfectly centered, not even 1 mm off. You cannot get such perfect centering with a typewritter.

Defenders of the documents point out that the the MS Word reproductions don't match up exactly. But keep in mind that MS Word does not print documents; a printer does, which can account for the slight alterations of the baseline. In addition, copying and faxing documents might also allow for the discrepencies.

Here's my guess as to what happened: someone knows exactly how Bush avoided Vietnam and how he didn't fullfill his guard service. This person knew all the details, but didn't have any smoking guns, so forged some documents. CBS got ahold of these documents and it asked other people if their contents were believable, and of course people in the know, such as the secretary, said yes. CBS passed the documents to the White House, who looked at them and said holy shit! This is exactly what happened. So the White House didn't denounce them. At the same time, CBS ignored some critics who stated that the documents were foged:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A21675-2004Sep14?language=printer

They went ahead with the story, and now we have forged documents that state the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC