Did you think the NTSB explanation for this crash was plausible? I could understand a mechanical malfunction that caused the tail to come off (especially interested in the composite materials in the tail and how attached). But didn't they attribute contributing factor to wake turbulence from previous planes taking off? That always seemed bogus to me.
I know a lot there were :tinfoilhat: 'ers that this crash so close to 9-11 and in NYC who believe this crash was terrorism covered up by the Bushies so the airline industry wouldn't be crippled.
I always respect you and DemoTex's opinions on aviation matters here.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
