You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: Because it's a link of conclusions, fed by more intelligence. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-11 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Because it's a link of conclusions, fed by more intelligence.
Look at it this way: If it was that crystal clear, and Obama was so focused on the matter, why didn't the raid happen on 2/1/09?

Or 2/1/10?

Or 2/1/11?

("A few yards," by the way, is something like 400 or 500.)

Oddly, it's been pointed out that the presence of Pak Army installations so close acted as protective cover, whether or not the Army was actively involved in sheltering him. Sending drones or a mission in there was risky: The Army base has its own secrets and the present of active-duty but unauthorized Seals on a mission might well provoke a response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC