Reply #42: Yep. He sure is. [View All]

[tom_paine]

I was always a Clark supporter, but Dean was always my #2 choice...a close #2 who I would have happily worked for & donated after the nomination.

Dean "challenged the Matrix" which looks more and more Soviet every day. So did Clark.

Unfortunately, it is entirely clear that Clark was "taken out" with a well-timed strike. Admittedly, he gave them a reason with that mildly weird scream, but as I always say about the Busheviks, to think that he could have done something to stop it by not screaming is ludicruous.

They would have found something else to play so repeatedly I did think I was in the Soviet Union for awhile and Howard Dean was Leon Trotsky.

Kerry worries me for any number of reasons, not the least of which is the fact that he is rapidly reverting to the old form of not standing up for himself aggressively and waffling.

If Dean were in Kerry's place and asked why he voted for the Iraq War Resolution, he would have likely said something like this,

"Well, yes Tim, I did vote for it. Of course, that was because I assumed that the intelligence I was being shown was accurate. Had I know it was a tissue of lies I would have voted differently."

(I also believe Clark would have responded similarly)

But Kerry is reverting now that Dean and Clark are gone and I worry. I also worry about how hard Kerry will fight once he gets it to rid the nation of it's Totalitarian Sub-Unit. These Bushevik Monsters, who owe their allegience not to America, but to their Imperial Masters, must be uprooted.

For that, we also need Moderate and non-Imperial True Republicans to step up and take back their Party. But we also need a Democratic President to understand the magnitude of the problem.

And I don't think Kerry does. Dean is right on the money, but will Kerry do what is necessary and go on the offensive as Dean and Clark would have?

So far, the answer seems to be the bad one.