3. The Times endorsed Bush because Blethen made them
They're editorial board was unanimous for Gore, but it was overruled by Blethen solely because of inheritence tax issues.
I am not saying that that was the right thing to do (it certainly WASN'T), but it isn't right to condemn or imply alterior motives when a newspaper prints research from a University of Washington study solely because their editorial board was forcibly overruled four years ago (as far as I can tell, the only time this has happened).
Can you not take time to look at the whole rather than focusing on a one time flaw?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
