You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: He gave useful information when he said he had no WMD [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-01-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. He gave useful information when he said he had no WMD
But that was ignored by Wolfowitz et al. So, why should we believe anything they say he says.

And, when is the (open to public scrutiny) trial? I will be much more likely to believe testimony that has been subject to cross examination, lawyers, rules of evidence, etc., than the reporting of yet another unnamed U.S. official in a British newspaper. I rarely trust any public official who is afraid to tell us their name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC