You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: Rubbish. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Rubbish.
As a long-time editor (2.5 years), I know that most articles in the Wikipedia move forward without controversy. Just about all of the articles in my sizable watchlist are becoming better and better articles, mostly due to other editors' work.

As far as some admins and other editors go, yes, a few are anal, snippy and occasionally mean, but I've found those to be few and far between in 2 1/2 years.

I have found Wikipedia to be mostly inviting, especially to those who are serious about contributing to an encyclopedia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC