You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: I think foriegn governments are more pragmatic than that. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I think foriegn governments are more pragmatic than that.
Edited on Fri Jul-15-05 05:41 PM by K-W
"However, what I referred to is exactly the incremental isolation of the United States that we are seeing today (mentioned a couple of posts up). Countries that were isolated as America's enemies are now forming tacit military and economic alliances openly and brazenly. When these countries find a way to divorce themselves from US dependence, then we will see a ramping up of these tactics."

Certainly, in fact it was just these trends that spawned the new American Imperial Strategy. We can no longer suppress regional development, particularly in Asia and Europe through the old model. This is why the US is now destroying the old model of world order and returning to a more overt style of control.

The UN for instance used to be a tool of US control, but as time passed it became a thorn in the US's side. We went from never vetoing a UN resolution (because we basically controlled the UN) to becomming the veto leader. So now we scorn the UN and go out of our way to prove that it doesnt matter.

"The object is to bring the US to its knees by influencing key commodities and markets and letting the US have enough rope to hang itself economically."

I disagree with that. Taking this tact would alost certainly throw the whole world into military and economic chaos. Other countries dont want the US destroyed or humiliated, they simply want more balance in power. The other powerful nations still have a stake in retaining something close to the current world order, any major upset could lead to a catastrophe like real democracy breaking out or something.

Its like corporations. Even when they are competing, they are still, to a large extent conspiring. It is far more important for all the industrial nations to protect the overall international order (with elite countries and undeveloped countries) than it is to restrict the US. Other nations will try to make moves wherever possible, but thier eventual goal probably does include a very powerful US. Just as the US's goals always included a powerful Europe and Japan. They were so valuable in keeping the international order that we had to tolerate thier economic competition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC