|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Roon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 10:45 AM Original message |
Panel backs vaccination of 11-, 12-year-old girls against cervical cancer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
1. This is NOT a good day for * |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catabryna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. And, now I'm waiting for the studies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xenu (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:48 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. yes, indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
E-Z-B (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:35 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. We had a bad day yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heidi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
2. Direct link and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPrax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
5. Whoa... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:46 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. get real, that's less than two pap tests! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 03:57 PM Response to Reply #6 |
39. Still, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 05:16 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. separate issue completely... no reason at all not to support this and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thinkingwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 08:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
48. uh, yes and no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:47 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. While I voted I would have my daughter (if I had one) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
matcom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:49 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. "Um...let's not get too crazy here in the support..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 12:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
matcom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 01:02 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. having nursed my wife back to health from stage 4 cervical cancer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 01:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Umm.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 01:14 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. What do you mean by "we"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 01:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. "We", I guess, is scientists who aren't in pharma's pocket? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 01:44 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Any links from credible scientific journals to support your claims? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 02:10 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Sure, I've seen a few in Lancet and in JAMA, and PNARMB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 02:19 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Duesberg, of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 02:24 PM Response to Reply #32 |
35. gotcha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 12:23 AM Response to Reply #27 |
56. Do you also have any links from CREDIBLE scientific journals that show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatFelyne (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 01:31 AM Response to Reply #27 |
57. Still waiting to get those references ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 01:47 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. You use the phrase "in addition to"-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 01:55 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 07:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
46. I've checked out RFKJrs' "stuff on vaccinations". It's crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:38 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. "You" say it's crap, but LOTS of experts say it's not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 10:28 AM Response to Reply #53 |
60. No, there are no CREDIBLE experts that agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 12:05 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. Don't make me laugh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 01:02 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. I'm not trying to make you laugh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaulaFarrell (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 01:34 PM Response to Reply #60 |
69. But vaccines can cripple children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 02:33 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. Anecdotal evidence does not constitute proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 02:32 PM Response to Reply #53 |
72. Cite your claims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ramsey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 09:34 AM Response to Reply #19 |
58. You're "ignorances" are incorrect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 02:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
71. I suppose you would prefer kids die of polio instead of being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 01:18 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. You may want to check your "facts" as at least 2-out-of-3 are wrong. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 01:19 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. I have, and they're right nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tesha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 01:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. In your dreams, perhaps. Not here in reality. (NT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 02:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
36. a) we do know b) we do know c) it will save lives |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 04:09 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. I'll let you get the last word after this one, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrPrax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 02:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
33. You got a crystal ball |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
matcom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 05:35 PM Response to Reply #33 |
45. READ THE FUCK DOWN A BIT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
matcom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 08:03 PM Response to Reply #33 |
47. thanks for your IM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 12:03 AM Response to Reply #33 |
55. Dude, take that crap and shove it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catabryna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:51 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. I can assure you that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shallah Kali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Compare that to the cost of cancer treatments for this disease |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alarimer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 02:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
74. And the cosrt may drop as the ramp up production |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 12:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. "Um...let's not get too crazy here in the support..."??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 01:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. I don't think that's what he meant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 01:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Um, focusing on a single pathogen HAS worked for AIDS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 04:29 PM Response to Reply #29 |
42. This is "success"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 12:18 PM Response to Reply #42 |
66. fuck yeah it's success. aids was a death sentence, and is no longer one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
54. Yeah, see that's what destroys Big Pharma's arguments as far as I can see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaulaFarrell (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 01:46 PM Response to Reply #54 |
70. Actually they do make one drug at least free |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 11:46 AM Response to Reply #5 |
62. It isn't effective unless taken *BEFORE* a girl/woman contracts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gully (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
10. My guess is they'll start with "inner city" girls? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
12. Good news. The Advisory Committee recommendation carries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noonwitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
14. This is good news for women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
16. Are the vaccines stabilized with mercury? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bridget Burke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
34. Given the drug companies luck with deadly side effects lately... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 04:16 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. While that's smart... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
37. I truly can't believe what I'm reading on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WindRavenX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:28 PM Response to Reply #37 |
52. it's disgusting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ramsey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 09:38 AM Response to Reply #37 |
59. Astonishing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
38. I'm glad the panel backed it because that will give families some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
44. Isn't this the "teen sex cult" drug? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 05:25 PM Response to Reply #44 |
75. Fast Forward 30 Years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bedazzled (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
49. sure i'll give my kid a merck drug. same folks who gave us vioxx |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
50. Boy the wingnuts must be pissed off about this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pooja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-29-06 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
51. Ya'll are letting Repugs into your brain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-01-06 10:00 AM Response to Reply #51 |
77. Stop making sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zann725 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
61. There's something about this "vaccinating" 12-13 yr. old GIRLS/WOMEN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
matcom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 11:48 AM Response to Reply #61 |
63. my GAWD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 11:53 AM Response to Reply #61 |
64. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #61 |
68. Hmm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phylny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 08:30 PM Response to Reply #61 |
76. When I was thirteen (35 years ago) I recall my doctor explaining to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-01-06 01:10 PM Response to Reply #61 |
78. are you really a woman? sorry, i doubt it, or you are VERY young |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Jun 12th 2024, 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC