Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(81,220 posts)
52. I was afraid of that.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 06:23 PM
Jun 2016

Didn't want to believe it but that was my first thought. Amazing how that little tidbit didn't get out til now.

As Sanders advisors said after the CA vote, Bernie called the shots. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1
The ability to choose advisors and campaign staff well is critical to a candidates' success. (nt) ehrnst Jun 2016 #2
I see that mistake made in the business world all the time MaggieD Jun 2016 #6
I see the same thing bravenak Jun 2016 #34
At the least a business or organization should have personnel that matches LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #40
Double-sided coins for coin flips? brush Jun 2016 #3
That was probably a joke unc70 Jun 2016 #4
Yeah, that one demonstrate complete ignorance about Nevada Caucuses. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #11
What does that mean, "double-sided coin"? calimary Jun 2016 #39
They wanted to cheat. nt Cali_Democrat Jun 2016 #42
I was afraid of that. calimary Jun 2016 #52
Its called a joke... GeorgiaPeanuts Jun 2016 #53
Sure it was. By the way Bernie actually won a large number in IA. synergie Jun 2016 #60
Well okay, I guess. But it's not very funny. calimary Jul 2016 #61
It does. A phony coin with two tails or two heads to win coin flips. brush Jun 2016 #49
He relied on large rallies and had no ground game and failed miserably to organize his supporters KittyWampus Jun 2016 #5
He didn't use his resources well MaggieD Jun 2016 #9
easy to critique his hiring choices, but realistically Clinton had already locked up geek tragedy Jun 2016 #7
That's a good point MaggieD Jun 2016 #10
I dunno, that campaign overachieved all things considered nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #13
Also true nt MaggieD Jun 2016 #16
It did surprisingly well, all things considered.... Adrahil Jun 2016 #18
He way outspent Hillary ehrnst Jun 2016 #29
I thought that the reason the guy in CA quite was because he wanted to focus on the ground game and politicaljunkie41910 Jun 2016 #46
Yes, that's correct. I also think that if he had hired enough staff for ehrnst Jun 2016 #56
I'm sure there was no shortage of good campaign people. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Jun 2016 #14
Interesting that you say "Locked up." ehrnst Jun 2016 #15
That's what I was thinking democrattotheend Jun 2016 #50
I thought about posting this...and then thought I'd be accused of "revisiting" the Primary brooklynite Jun 2016 #8
"Lessons Learned" is a positive activity, otherwise mistakes will be repeated. FSogol Jun 2016 #12
And of course the media bias RobertEarl Jun 2016 #17
If you want to talk about media "bias".... ehrnst Jun 2016 #19
The only bad press is no press at all demwing Jun 2016 #23
No. Not really. ehrnst Jun 2016 #24
Yes. Really. demwing Jun 2016 #26
Well, then we disagree. ehrnst Jun 2016 #27
It's an outdated concept that wasn't ever really true. These days with social media and stevenleser Jun 2016 #37
That is true for a Hollywood actor, not a politician. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #36
I honestly did not see that. Adrahil Jun 2016 #20
There was a critical month or two late 2015. Armstead Jun 2016 #41
I didn't get that impression at all from viewing coverage. Jitter65 Jun 2016 #21
Absolutely. (nt) ehrnst Jun 2016 #28
That is the way I saw it. I saw Sanders on more than I did Clinton. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #44
Ditto MaggieD Jun 2016 #51
Never once felt the media hated Bernie... apcalc Jun 2016 #35
Not being Hillary Clinton. Orsino Jun 2016 #22
However, Bernie outspent Hillary ehrnst Jun 2016 #25
The built-in connections and fan base of the Clintons would certainly have been a big help. Orsino Jun 2016 #31
Agreed. I was always a fan of his issues. ehrnst Jun 2016 #32
Single-payer is the most cost-effective way to cover everyone... Orsino Jun 2016 #54
Yes, however, it's not really possible at this point. ehrnst Jun 2016 #55
"Possible" and "feasible" are defeatist framing. Orsino Jun 2016 #59
There are other ways to achieve universal coverage than Single Payer ehrnst Jul 2016 #62
I believe I just said all that. Orsino Jul 2016 #63
I think he also started too late. eom charlyvi Jun 2016 #45
Nevada was where the race ended Renew Deal Jun 2016 #30
I felt that way, too. calimary Jun 2016 #38
I thought it ended in Iowa. It was obvious to me that if Bernie didnt win big victories in all the stevenleser Jun 2016 #47
Any progressive insurgency needs to forjusticethunders Jun 2016 #33
My assessment is that Sanders ran a remarkably conventional campaign. brooklynite Jun 2016 #57
It was there but forjusticethunders Jun 2016 #58
Bernie Sanders? Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2016 #48
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»CBS News: What Went Wrong...»Reply #52