Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(81,126 posts)
39. What does that mean, "double-sided coin"?
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 04:42 PM
Jun 2016

Curious. I hope it doesn't mean what I think it does.

As Sanders advisors said after the CA vote, Bernie called the shots. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1
The ability to choose advisors and campaign staff well is critical to a candidates' success. (nt) ehrnst Jun 2016 #2
I see that mistake made in the business world all the time MaggieD Jun 2016 #6
I see the same thing bravenak Jun 2016 #34
At the least a business or organization should have personnel that matches LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #40
Double-sided coins for coin flips? brush Jun 2016 #3
That was probably a joke unc70 Jun 2016 #4
Yeah, that one demonstrate complete ignorance about Nevada Caucuses. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #11
What does that mean, "double-sided coin"? calimary Jun 2016 #39
They wanted to cheat. nt Cali_Democrat Jun 2016 #42
I was afraid of that. calimary Jun 2016 #52
Its called a joke... GeorgiaPeanuts Jun 2016 #53
Sure it was. By the way Bernie actually won a large number in IA. synergie Jun 2016 #60
Well okay, I guess. But it's not very funny. calimary Jul 2016 #61
It does. A phony coin with two tails or two heads to win coin flips. brush Jun 2016 #49
He relied on large rallies and had no ground game and failed miserably to organize his supporters KittyWampus Jun 2016 #5
He didn't use his resources well MaggieD Jun 2016 #9
easy to critique his hiring choices, but realistically Clinton had already locked up geek tragedy Jun 2016 #7
That's a good point MaggieD Jun 2016 #10
I dunno, that campaign overachieved all things considered nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #13
Also true nt MaggieD Jun 2016 #16
It did surprisingly well, all things considered.... Adrahil Jun 2016 #18
He way outspent Hillary ehrnst Jun 2016 #29
I thought that the reason the guy in CA quite was because he wanted to focus on the ground game and politicaljunkie41910 Jun 2016 #46
Yes, that's correct. I also think that if he had hired enough staff for ehrnst Jun 2016 #56
I'm sure there was no shortage of good campaign people. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #43
This message was self-deleted by its author stopbush Jun 2016 #14
Interesting that you say "Locked up." ehrnst Jun 2016 #15
That's what I was thinking democrattotheend Jun 2016 #50
I thought about posting this...and then thought I'd be accused of "revisiting" the Primary brooklynite Jun 2016 #8
"Lessons Learned" is a positive activity, otherwise mistakes will be repeated. FSogol Jun 2016 #12
And of course the media bias RobertEarl Jun 2016 #17
If you want to talk about media "bias".... ehrnst Jun 2016 #19
The only bad press is no press at all demwing Jun 2016 #23
No. Not really. ehrnst Jun 2016 #24
Yes. Really. demwing Jun 2016 #26
Well, then we disagree. ehrnst Jun 2016 #27
It's an outdated concept that wasn't ever really true. These days with social media and stevenleser Jun 2016 #37
That is true for a Hollywood actor, not a politician. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #36
I honestly did not see that. Adrahil Jun 2016 #20
There was a critical month or two late 2015. Armstead Jun 2016 #41
I didn't get that impression at all from viewing coverage. Jitter65 Jun 2016 #21
Absolutely. (nt) ehrnst Jun 2016 #28
That is the way I saw it. I saw Sanders on more than I did Clinton. LiberalFighter Jun 2016 #44
Ditto MaggieD Jun 2016 #51
Never once felt the media hated Bernie... apcalc Jun 2016 #35
Not being Hillary Clinton. Orsino Jun 2016 #22
However, Bernie outspent Hillary ehrnst Jun 2016 #25
The built-in connections and fan base of the Clintons would certainly have been a big help. Orsino Jun 2016 #31
Agreed. I was always a fan of his issues. ehrnst Jun 2016 #32
Single-payer is the most cost-effective way to cover everyone... Orsino Jun 2016 #54
Yes, however, it's not really possible at this point. ehrnst Jun 2016 #55
"Possible" and "feasible" are defeatist framing. Orsino Jun 2016 #59
There are other ways to achieve universal coverage than Single Payer ehrnst Jul 2016 #62
I believe I just said all that. Orsino Jul 2016 #63
I think he also started too late. eom charlyvi Jun 2016 #45
Nevada was where the race ended Renew Deal Jun 2016 #30
I felt that way, too. calimary Jun 2016 #38
I thought it ended in Iowa. It was obvious to me that if Bernie didnt win big victories in all the stevenleser Jun 2016 #47
Any progressive insurgency needs to forjusticethunders Jun 2016 #33
My assessment is that Sanders ran a remarkably conventional campaign. brooklynite Jun 2016 #57
It was there but forjusticethunders Jun 2016 #58
Bernie Sanders? Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2016 #48
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»CBS News: What Went Wrong...»Reply #39