Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Revelations and Reviews April 26-28, 2013 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)THE WHOLE POINT OF THE SEQUESTER WAS THAT HORRIBLE CONSEQUENCES LIKE FLIGHT DELAYS WOULD FORCE A COMPROMISE IN THE BUDGET PROCESS
LOOKS LIKE THE ONLY COMPROMISE WILL BE TO SAVE THE 1% INCONVENIENCE WHILE SCREWING THE POOR, UNEMPLOYED AND UNCONNECTED, AS USUAL...
http://news.yahoo.com/white-house-calls-effort-end-airport-delays-good-140534158.html
The U.S. Congress on Friday approved a plan to ease nationwide air-traffic delays caused by federal spending cuts, seeking to calm irritated travelers but sparking a backlash from groups still being hit by budget cuts. The Senate unanimously voted for the plan late Thursday and the House of Representatives approved it Friday by a 361-41 vote. White House spokesman Jay Carney said President Barack Obama intends to sign the bill. The legislation will give the Department of Transportation flexibility to use about $250 million in unspent funds to cover immediate salaries of air traffic controllers and other essential employees at the Federal Aviation Administration who had been furloughed.
Lawmakers hurried the bill through, eager to stem the growing wrath of the traveling public, which had dealt with significant take-off and landing delays since the furloughs started on Sunday. They also had faced anger from airline CEOs whose companies had mounted a grassroots campaign through a website called dontgroundamerica.com, encouraging Americans to send messages to Congress and the White House. Congressional approval of the air travel bill, barely four pages long, came as lawmakers prepared to fly out of Washington for a week-long recess. It was not clear how quickly the air delays would ease once the bill is enacted.
Democratic Representative Chris Van Hollen of Maryland chided fellow lawmakers for frantically pushing the bill through just before the break, making their upcoming travels easier. "They will pat themselves on the back and say job well done," said Van Hollen, who wanted to address more than just FAA furloughs.
The union representing the controllers was relieved. "After just one week of furloughs, it is abundantly clear that a fully staffed air traffic control workforce is necessary for our national airspace system to operate at full capacity," the National Air Traffic Controllers Association said...