Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

arewenotdemo

(2,364 posts)

6. But what if evidence indicated that our freedom-loving jihadists got their hands on some?

Reply to DonViejo (Original post)

Sat Apr 27, 2013, 01:20 AM

Apr 2013

And used it, blaming it on the Syrian "regime"?

Wouldn't that constitute a "game-changer" and wouldn't they have "crossed a red line"?

Or would Obama just look the other way, the same way he doesn't condemn the car bombings in Damascus or any other rebel atrocities?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Syrian officials deny use of chemical weapons [View all] DonViejo Apr 2013 OP

"varying degrees of confidence" cartach Apr 2013 #1

israel is doing surveillance for the US and others Mosby Apr 2013 #8

The case against Syria is very week, yet the war drums beat along the Potomac. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2013 #2

It makes absolutely ZERO sense for Assad to use chemical weapons. riderinthestorm Apr 2013 #3

Plus what's the military advantage even in the tactical sense? David__77 Apr 2013 #4

Oh, there is a military advantage in it demcoat Apr 2013 #5

I oppose US intervention regardless of use of chemical weapons. David__77 Apr 2013 #7

does the death toll concern you? Mosby Apr 2013 #10

Yes, and the US has played a negative role. We should give food and medical aid. David__77 Apr 2013 #11

What if the Syrian government has killed many times the number of Syrian civilians pampango Apr 2013 #13

Maybe we should just mind our own business. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2013 #15

I am all for minding our own business. But I am not for allowing dictators to kill their own people pampango Apr 2013 #17

We are involved in increasing the death toll. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2013 #14

What if chemical weapons were used on other Syrians rather than on an 'invading force'? pampango Apr 2013 #9

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #12

Because, as a wise poster above said, "... there is a military advantage in it." pampango Apr 2013 #16

Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #18

But what if evidence indicated that our freedom-loving jihadists got their hands on some? arewenotdemo Apr 2013 #6