Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Oh Really? Looking back-O’Connor said she isn’t sure high court should have taken the "2000" case [View all]hatrack
(59,583 posts)57. Wow, and it only took 12.5 years for "regret" to set in!
Good thing she wasn't so hesitant back in November, 2001, huh?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Oh Really? Looking back-O’Connor said she isn’t sure high court should have taken the "2000" case [View all]
kpete
Apr 2013
OP
They should have left it at 7 to 2 for Florida court to make final decision. Instead of the 4 to 5
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#4
Meanwhile, the ghosts of Stalin and Hitler pause in their shoveling of coal in Hell
Brimley
Apr 2013
#11
Her husband was failing and she wanted to retire then, but under a GOP President.
kickysnana
Apr 2013
#18
I'm sorry, but that takes a lot of nerve. I really disliked her and her
senseandsensibility
Apr 2013
#20
And they were supposed to be the best legal minds in the country. Problem at the end of the day. No
jwirr
Apr 2013
#21
What a lying sack shit she is, her vote was never undecided. On Election night when the results
UTUSN
Apr 2013
#25