Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Krugman: The Great Degrader [View all]AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)48. I disagree a little bit....
I mean NIXON! "I am not a crook."
And of course Iran Contra....
We've had liars and crooks... big ones (makes lying about a BJ look like what it was...nothing)
I think what makes Bush Jr. so different is he's not remotely in charge. Even Ronnie Raygun seemed more in the middle of it. Bush is the 1st President not to be in charge at all. Just a fund raiser and TV personality while others, who no one voted for or even liked enough to be on TV in an engaging way (now who could I be talking about?) ran things from an undisclosed location.
Nixon and Reagan were trial versions of the Cardboard Cutout President (Reagan) who is really a committee that does as it pleases (Nixon).... perfected with Bush.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No doubt W was the worst ever, but no more of the "we may never recover" melodrama, please.
reformist2
Apr 2013
#7
No, there is no question. Bush was the worse and yes, we may never recover.
Katashi_itto
Apr 2013
#10
The absurdity of the control we allowed Karl Rove to gain over our nation
Cliff Arnebeck
Apr 2013
#32
Neither George W. Bush nor Karl Rove Individually Wrecked the Havoc.
Justina For Justice
Apr 2013
#40