Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Oh Really? Looking back-O’Connor said she isn’t sure high court should have taken the "2000" case [View all]elleng
(130,773 posts)42. Glad to see she's willing to state her concerns publicly.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Oh Really? Looking back-O’Connor said she isn’t sure high court should have taken the "2000" case [View all]
kpete
Apr 2013
OP
They should have left it at 7 to 2 for Florida court to make final decision. Instead of the 4 to 5
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#4
Meanwhile, the ghosts of Stalin and Hitler pause in their shoveling of coal in Hell
Brimley
Apr 2013
#11
Her husband was failing and she wanted to retire then, but under a GOP President.
kickysnana
Apr 2013
#18
I'm sorry, but that takes a lot of nerve. I really disliked her and her
senseandsensibility
Apr 2013
#20
And they were supposed to be the best legal minds in the country. Problem at the end of the day. No
jwirr
Apr 2013
#21
What a lying sack shit she is, her vote was never undecided. On Election night when the results
UTUSN
Apr 2013
#25