Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
20. The airport subsidies such as taxpayer funded air traffic control are all for the wealthy
Sat Apr 27, 2013, 11:30 AM
Apr 2013

and megacorps. People who work at McDonalds, people who earn minimum wage, fly very rarely if at all.

Middle class people fly occasionally but not often.

It's big business that uses the airports the most. Yet corporations do not pay the taxes that keep up our costly security and everything else related to air travel. Here is an article on the cost of airport security.

. . . .

Yet the TSA still commands a budget of nearly $8 billion—which is why the agency is left with too many officers and not enough to do. The TSA’s “Top Good Catches of 2011,” reported on its blog, did include 1,200 firearms and—their top find—a single batch of C4 explosives (though those were discovered only on the return flight). A longer list of TSA’s confiscations would include a G.I. Joe action doll’s 4-inch plastic rifle (“it’s a replica”) and a light saber. And needless to say, the TSA didn’t spot a single terrorist trying to board an airline in the U.S., notes Bruce Schneier.

According to one estimate of direct and indirect costs borne by the U.S. as a result of 9/11, the New York Times suggested the attacks themselves caused $55 billion in “toll and physical damage,” while the economic impact was $123 billion. But costs related to increased homeland security and counterterrorism spending, as well as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, totaled $3,105 billion. Mueller and Stewart estimate that government spending on homeland security over the 2002-11 period accounted for around $580 billion of that total.

Article dated Nov. 18, 2011

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-11-18/how-airport-security-is-killing-us

And from the right-wing CATO Institute, the admission:

In fiscal 2011, the FAA budget will be about $16.4 billion.1 Of the total, $9.7 billion will go toward "operations," which includes $7.6 billion for air traffic control operations, $1.3 billion for safety regulation and certification, and $0.8 billion for other functions. In addition, the FAA will spend $3.3 billion in 2011 on capital investments in ATC facilities, equipment, and research. Most of the rest of FAA's budget, about $3.4 billion, will go toward grants to state and local governments for airport investments.

http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/transportation/airports-atc

That is only a tiny percentage of what was spent on food stamps last year, but food stamps keep people alive. If the FAA and airport security budgets were paid directly out of taxes on airline ticket sales and totally covered by those taxes, it would make a lot more sense.

If airport customers cannot cover the costs of flying, why encourage airport use? Why subsidize the travel of people who could afford to pay more? Many of the people who fly most frequently are the most enthusiastic about budget cuts. I'm sure they won't mind.

You got it Ed madokie Apr 2013 #1
I figured edhopper Apr 2013 #4
Then we could beef up the military too! think Apr 2013 #2
Of course edhopper Apr 2013 #3
We need those sharks with fricken lasers on their heads MattBaggins Apr 2013 #31
But they cost edhopper Apr 2013 #32
But teh defense contractors need them!1!!! RyanThomas Apr 2013 #36
I'm not sure about this. SheilaT Apr 2013 #15
I'm sure the Free Market God (May the blessings of Saint Reagan be upon it) will help them. RyanThomas Apr 2013 #37
Eliminate all the tax breaks for the wealthy and the megacorps. lpbk2713 Apr 2013 #5
The airport subsidies such as taxpayer funded air traffic control are all for the wealthy JDPriestly Apr 2013 #20
Yes, Newest Reality Apr 2013 #6
Well the three biggest aids to the middle class edhopper Apr 2013 #7
We need to stamp out food stamp use too. Stamps are for mail not people. L0oniX Apr 2013 #16
Oh, there would be short-term benefits, to be sure Cirque du So-What Apr 2013 #8
I'm sure Eric Prince will be there to help out. L0oniX Apr 2013 #18
Still, in the back of their mind... Cirque du So-What Apr 2013 #22
What? Did I stumble on the Freeper beveeheart Apr 2013 #9
Read my signature edhopper Apr 2013 #12
You must have stumbled over yourself. L0oniX Apr 2013 #14
And that's why we have... Cirque du So-What Apr 2013 #23
I know edhopper Apr 2013 #24
Sometimes I use it, sometimes not Cirque du So-What Apr 2013 #25
Like you, I didn't think I needed it either. beveeheart Apr 2013 #34
So, when someone gets ALL the money.... Do they win? world wide wally Apr 2013 #10
I think that edhopper Apr 2013 #11
WHAT?? Are you suggesting we live in SheilaT Apr 2013 #17
Oh there ya go with that same ol quantum physics meme. Reality is being made as I write this too. L0oniX Apr 2013 #19
So much poverty for so many - So much wealth for so few Dragonfli Apr 2013 #21
I guess that if the only people left are the Koch brothers and Donald Trump... then the Koch's world wide wally Apr 2013 #30
Back in 2008 edhopper Apr 2013 #33
National Parks running??? WTF! Cut down those trees and start fracking NOW! L0oniX Apr 2013 #13
Almost a perfect plan BethanyQuartz Apr 2013 #26
Why bury them edhopper Apr 2013 #27
right wingers will tell me treestar Apr 2013 #28
They probably believe if you pull up on your bootstraps edhopper Apr 2013 #29
yes, the US would be guatemala. that would be fantastico! HiPointDem Apr 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If we only eliminated all...»Reply #20