Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FarPoint

(12,207 posts)
13. You nailed that one correctly.
Sat Apr 27, 2013, 10:40 AM
Apr 2013

We can always count on the village attention seeker to rise to the occasion.

Ralph Nader/NH was compicit in the theft of the 2000 election, is my answer, choice not there. graham4anything Apr 2013 #1
Hilarious! Octafish Apr 2013 #5
You nailed that one correctly. FarPoint Apr 2013 #13
No, Bush, the GOP in Florida and the Supreme Court stole the 2000 election. One of the 99 Apr 2013 #7
So running for president in the US is illegal? What was illegal about Ralph Nader's run sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #8
Without NH's 4 going for Bush, Gore was seated. It is a plain fact. 267 plus 4=271 graham4anything Apr 2013 #12
We are talking about the illegal theft of an election. You did not answer the question. The sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #18
Not true. IF it was a pre-planned conspiracy and not a CT, then yes, Nader part of it graham4anything Apr 2013 #20
Democrats voted for Thomas. So what's your point? The USSC committed a crime. sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #21
Russ Feingold voted for John Roberts graham4anything Apr 2013 #28
You're either with the DLC... dreamnightwind Apr 2013 #34
Lol, so did Joe Biden. Again, what is your point other than avoiding the question I asked sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #35
And without Gore, Nader would have been seated. n/t Orsino Apr 2013 #49
How? Where would the 270 have come from? graham4anything Apr 2013 #50
That was more or less my point. Orsino Apr 2013 #51
No, it is nothing the same. There should only be 2 running in the general. graham4anything Apr 2013 #52
Not according to the Constitution. n/t Orsino Apr 2013 #56
Then don't complain about anything W ever did. According to it, W won. graham4anything Apr 2013 #57
My takeaway here is that third-party candidates shouldn't be allowed? Orsino Apr 2013 #58
"Bushfamily was compicit in the democratic party not being seated in the elections of Jenoch Apr 2013 #9
Gish Gallop - it's g4a's tactic of choice blm Apr 2013 #17
Nailed it. EOTE Apr 2013 #22
41,41,41,41,41,41,41. graham4anything Apr 2013 #23
Good to know. Jenoch Apr 2013 #26
I blame Gore significantly more than I blame Nader for Gore's loss. ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #31
Complicit? Coyotl Apr 2013 #2
W. was always a stooge. Always. Orsino Apr 2013 #44
More like a very willing tool Coyotl Apr 2013 #47
Yes. We blew trillions and lost hundreds of thousands of people... Orsino Apr 2013 #48
He stole it and was aided and abetted by his brother and the Florida GOP and various stevenleser Apr 2013 #3
Exactly! FarPoint Apr 2013 #14
Here's the "Fahrenheit 9-11" scene with Dubya & Jeb sitting in a plane guaranteeing the interviewer pacalo Apr 2013 #19
The BFEE had an idiot cousin working at Fox noise calling Florida for the smirking gangster. Octafish Apr 2013 #4
Ditto cheers for Cliff Arnebeck! FarPoint Apr 2013 #16
Thanks to Octafish, expert on major media and politics Cliff Arnebeck Apr 2013 #41
Of course he was complicit. HappyMe Apr 2013 #6
Yes, he did. He had Katherine Harris, his entire crooked family, mostly The USSC who committed sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #10
We have our work cut out for us for 2014 and beyond. HappyMe Apr 2013 #15
the protest or fracture will throw the election to Jeb. Is it not obvious? graham4anything Apr 2013 #24
So what you are saying is that we should never, ever protest bad policies put forward by our sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #27
Words have consequences. So do actions.Protesters are small minorities with loud voices graham4anything Apr 2013 #30
Too dumb to be the brains of the operation but he had to be actively complicit to pull it off. Gidney N Cloyd Apr 2013 #11
Exactly. nt Lisa0825 Apr 2013 #25
Kick! hedgehog Apr 2013 #29
Really? Theft of the Presidency? jschurchin Apr 2013 #32
Why it's important that the posters and voters in this thread consider your point of view Cliff Arnebeck Apr 2013 #36
My comment on this to Paul Krugman, in regard to his distaste for G.W. Bush Cliff Arnebeck Apr 2013 #42
Thank you for the links Cliff jschurchin Apr 2013 #43
What would you call it? Zoeisright Apr 2013 #46
There are semantical issues with the poll. ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #33
Both the 2000 and 2004 Presidential elections were a product of criminal election theft activity Cliff Arnebeck Apr 2013 #40
Bush has a thing for being the one to call shots. Knightraven Apr 2013 #37
JEB BUSH was complicit too! Auntie Bush Apr 2013 #38
Oh he definitely stole it no question, Initech Apr 2013 #39
Definitely innocent....... whistler162 Apr 2013 #45
Rove benefits from the vitriol unleashed against President G.W. Bush Cliff Arnebeck Apr 2013 #53
Hell yes, ridiculous to even suggest otherwise. lpbk2713 Apr 2013 #54
Bush made it pretty clear he didn't believe it when Florida was called for Gore. mattclearing Apr 2013 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»G. W. Bush--Innocent of t...»Reply #13