Friendly forums for passionate Dems!
More than 91 million posts since 2001
Home Latest Greatest Videos Forums Hide ads Join up!
Home Latest Greatest
Videos Forums Help
Hide ads Join up!
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why did John Roberts agre...»Reply #12
Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Why did John Roberts agree to take this New York case in the first place? [View all]

BamaRefugee

(3,483 posts)
12. Here's exactly what I'm talking about. "Trump gets a chance TO TRY NEW ARGUMENTS" 1st paragraph
Reply to StarfishSaver (Reply #7)
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 04:48 PM
Jul 2020
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-10/july-16-hearing-set-in-ny-trump-tax-case-after-high-court-rules

in my work, I have to testify in court often, I see judges who seem to want a case to go in a certain directions sometimes say to a lawyer "now if you were, let's say, citing Jones v. Smith, then I would see that as valid"...
TopBack to the top of the page AlertAlert this post for a rule violation ShareGet links to this post PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
  EditCannot edit other people's posts RecommendRecommend this post ReplyReply to this post

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why did John Roberts agree to take this New York case in the first place? [View all] Goodheart Jul 2020 OP
But but...isn't he a new Democratic hero??? I haven't trusted a Republican since my 1st vote in 1970 BamaRefugee Jul 2020 #1
Looks to me like he should have just allowed the lower court and Grand Jury to proceed, Goodheart Jul 2020 #3
It ended the bullshit Trump has complete immunity...and is thus above the law. It was Demsrule86 Jul 2020 #4
It done... FarPoint Jul 2020 #2
Not necessarily StarfishSaver Jul 2020 #5
The lower court may well give suggestions to trump on how to change some things and actually win the BamaRefugee Jul 2020 #6
I don't understand your post StarfishSaver Jul 2020 #7
Here's exactly what I'm talking about. "Trump gets a chance TO TRY NEW ARGUMENTS" 1st paragraph BamaRefugee Jul 2020 #12
He could do that anyway StarfishSaver Jul 2020 #13
New York State prosecutor Vance is looking for how payments to Stormy Daniels... Lock him up. Jul 2020 #8
Roberts alone can't decide to take a case on his own. rsdsharp Jul 2020 #9
He wanted to take it to assert conclusively to Trump that he is not above the law. cbdo2007 Jul 2020 #10
Simple, impeachment Polybius Jul 2020 #11
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why did John Roberts agre...»Reply #12
Home | Latest Discussions | Greatest Discussions | Latest Videos | All Forums

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2024 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.