Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Starry Messenger
Starry Messenger's Journal
Starry Messenger's Journal
September 11, 2015
Even the most hardcore social justice warrior (or paladin, cleric, rogue ) can fail to be a good ally to someone from a different group or identity at some point. What matters, what always matters, is how you deal with your fail. Did you apologize? Did you sit with yourself and examine what happened and why? Did you think about what being a good ally really means? Did you recommit yourself to being a better ally in the future?
Or did you double down with the idea that youre an ally, not one of those bigots out there, and you marched with King, and you supported some feminists in 1973, and youve done all this work, and therefore you didnt do anything wrong, you find nothing objectionable in what you did (or failed to do), and so the problem must be with the people youre allied to, and not with yourself. In other words: did you center yourself?
The kind of people who say Stop Attacking Your Allies are the kind who tie their allyship to specific behaviors from the group theyre supposedly interested in helping. They, the ally, want to dictate the terms of the relationship and want to be the one to say Now its the time to address this thing, instead of allowing the marginalized and oppressed folks to make that determination. The ally wants to set the rules for what is appropriate discourse, to determine the parameters for politeness, and the conditions under which they will use or set aside their privilege. Do I need to explain the problems with that?[2]
Are we really driving away our allies, or are we making it clear that we wont accept an ally relationship that is about the needs and comfort of the allies above everyone else? Yes, we might be making that clear with harsh language. And yes, in making that clear we might hurt some feelings. That happens when allies dont listen to the polite, patient words that come before the yelling.
Allies don't patronize and attack the people they claim to support.
Activists who wish to decrease oppression should avoid replicating the system of oppression created by the white male cis straight 1%.
http://tempest.fluidartist.com/sometimes-allies-are-bad-actors/
Even the most hardcore social justice warrior (or paladin, cleric, rogue ) can fail to be a good ally to someone from a different group or identity at some point. What matters, what always matters, is how you deal with your fail. Did you apologize? Did you sit with yourself and examine what happened and why? Did you think about what being a good ally really means? Did you recommit yourself to being a better ally in the future?
Or did you double down with the idea that youre an ally, not one of those bigots out there, and you marched with King, and you supported some feminists in 1973, and youve done all this work, and therefore you didnt do anything wrong, you find nothing objectionable in what you did (or failed to do), and so the problem must be with the people youre allied to, and not with yourself. In other words: did you center yourself?
The kind of people who say Stop Attacking Your Allies are the kind who tie their allyship to specific behaviors from the group theyre supposedly interested in helping. They, the ally, want to dictate the terms of the relationship and want to be the one to say Now its the time to address this thing, instead of allowing the marginalized and oppressed folks to make that determination. The ally wants to set the rules for what is appropriate discourse, to determine the parameters for politeness, and the conditions under which they will use or set aside their privilege. Do I need to explain the problems with that?[2]
Are we really driving away our allies, or are we making it clear that we wont accept an ally relationship that is about the needs and comfort of the allies above everyone else? Yes, we might be making that clear with harsh language. And yes, in making that clear we might hurt some feelings. That happens when allies dont listen to the polite, patient words that come before the yelling.
Profile Information
Name: Decline to StateGender: Female
Hometown: Sacramento, CA
Home country: USA
Current location: Left Coast
Member since: Sat Apr 9, 2005, 08:01 PM
Number of posts: 32,342