History of Feminism
Related: About this forumA feminist guide to celebrating Thatcher’s demise
(While in not a fan of grave dancing, I understand, as much a an American can, the depths of loathing so many British have for here, I loathe her from an American point of view.)
Ill start from the premise that anybody whos got as far as reading this had no particular love for Margaret Thatcher. If this doesnt apply to you, this article will not help. Youre on the wrong blog. Go away now. Bye bye.
Yesterday, today and probably for the next week or so, people are sharing the glad tidings around TwitFace in succinct missives ranging from jubilant celebration to wary reminders that this doesnt change the way things are and we must keep up the fight against Thatchers legacy. Theres nothing wrong with either of these sentiments. While we must not forget that the wheels she put in motion are still driving the cogs that grind us into submission on a daily basis, were also entitled to blow off a little steam, and even to celebrate the presence of one less architect of our oppression wasting our oxygen with their vile presence on this planet. However, unusually for a such a potent symbol of rampant destructive capital, and especially for one in a position to wield so much power against the working class, she was a woman. What does this mean for the conscientious Thatcher-basher? Lets try out a few suppositions that are making their presence felt throughout that amorphous confusion of privilege, oppression, liberal denial, radical indignation and occasional hope that our newspapers refer to as The Left.
Does it mean you cant say anything these days cos feminists and political correctness has gone mad innit?
No.
Does it mean that we have to acknowledge her as a feminist icon because being in power was harder for women and she raised womens political status and all that?
No. That is, it probably was harder for her than it would have been for a man, because patriarchy etc., but its not as if she was pursuing a feminist goal or fighting oppression. Her ambitions were quintessentially individualist. She wasnt raising the status of women, in fact she used every feminine stereotype she could to promote herself while reinforcing working class womens oppression. You dont get to claim any feminist kudos for breaking glass ceilings when you rain down shattered glass on the women below in the process. Feminism (which Thatcher loathed) wasnt, and isnt, about getting to the top and playing with the big boys, its about bringing the big boys down, along with all the structures maintained by patriarchy and capitalism. Lets get one thing entirely clear: Thatcher was no feminist, and she did shit all for women.
Does it mean that we cant vilify her because we wouldnt be vilifying a man in the same way?
No, we can definitely vilify her. But we should be careful about how we vilify her, because patriarchy does make it so much easier to vilify women as women, in ways that are harmful to all women rather than just the villains. That said, give her credit: she was vilified for far more than just her gender, and there are many very good reasons why Thatcher holds such a special place in the nations gallbladders. She was the one who turned on the tap for all the neoliberal free market shit weve been wading through for the past three decades. Why vilify her for being a woman when theres her role in privatising services, destroying industries, breaking unions, starting wars, atomising communities and, lest we forget, stealing milk from babies.
Its true that any other Prime Minister at that time would have done similar things, and that every one since has continued the job, and its also true that a man might have got away with much of it with less flack from the press. Doesnt make Thatcher any less of a villain. If we want to be fair and break down the gendered vilification, lets get ready to blow the roof off when Blair carks it.
http://angrywomen.wordpress.com/2013/04/09/thatchers-demise/
hlthe2b
(102,141 posts)The Brits are far less "forgetful" and "forgiving" than our US media. That says quite a lot, I think.
edited for typo
DURHAM D
(32,607 posts)I was watching tv this am and thinking about the most appropriate way to express my severe dislike of the Prime Minister.
I am having lunch with a Brit today who will struggle to keep her feminist hat on so I think I will send her this link in advance. It should be fun.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)I think that is gender-neutral. At least I hope it is, as I plan on repeating it when Cheney kicks the bucket.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)Let us all remember these wise words.
Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)She was an utter monster and it's a shame she died eighty-five years too late.
ismnotwasm
(41,968 posts)She hurt a lot of people with her politics, the 'not graving dancing' is a personal thing, not a judgement on anybody.