2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDems who say they won't vote for Hillary if she's the nominee remind me of...
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)veruca salt. lol
peacebird
(14,195 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)and now this. It really doesn't look good for HRC supporters to talk like this constantly. the victimhood thing is sad to me. Tell me ... if bernie wins, then what will you do? and I am asking. If he wins, what will you do.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)In this data mess, I will NOT vote for her. If this is how she thinks she is going to win, she's in the wrong party. I've seen the Clinton's work for over 20 years, and I know how they work. They LIE! As much as I liked Bill, it was really embarrassing to defend his lies about Monica and the many other women in the life of Bill Clinton.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)So I took that last part out. I stand by the rest. Men who cheat, also lie. Women who deny it, also lie to themselves and those around them. I will cast my vote for Hilliary if she is not involved in this data gate if she is the nominee. If she is cheating, I will stay home.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:45 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
If she is involved or her people involved
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=916749
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
For fuck sakes. Now we are trotting out Monica? It is highly offensive to read this kind of right wing attack on a Democratic website that many of us paid membership for. This website was created to escape the ridiculous right wing propaganda machine.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Dec 18, 2015, 11:57 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If the candidate can't take the criticism from their own party at this point in the campaign maybe it isn't going to work out after all....
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Bill Clinton did have an affair with Ms Lewinsky and he did lie about it. It's a fact, not a smear. If you think facts are "right wing propaganda," perhaps this is not the right site for you.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: these guys are taking care of this themselves. the poster seems to have edited something here. a vote to hide this would seem to escalate unnecessarily.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Post is a personal opinion, albeit strong, but that's what we do here - express personal opinions.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Hal Bent
(59 posts)I thought I signed up to Democratic Underground, not Dictatorial Underground!
pipoman
(16,038 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)LuvLoogie
(6,936 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)It's been a pleasure.
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)Are brainless robots who shouldn't be listened to.
840high
(17,196 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)It's not Hillary, it's the rigged system.
Well, it's a little bit Hillary, because a lot of us don't believe she will ever act in our best interest.
But above that, what is really sending people over the edge, is the rigged system, never more evident than today.
Any many of us feel a need to strike a blow, some kind of blow, against this rigged system, or keep getting more of the same.
oasis
(49,339 posts)after the mass exit.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Doesn't mean that what the DNC tried to pull today doesn't massively suck.
And, yeah, Veruca Salt is a voter, too.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)while HRC supports the profits of Goldman-Sachs. This is a class war and the 1% isn't going to help the 99%. Of course some worship the power and wealth of the 1% and don't care about the 16 million American children living in poverty. Gloat while you can, you have the billionaires on your side but the People will prevail.
Cha
(296,893 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)wealthy 1%.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Ok.
daybranch
(1,309 posts)telling Wall Street not to do something? LOL!
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)Leftyforever
(317 posts)to get us to consider voting for her....
merrily
(45,251 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Looks like HRC to me.
snot
(10,504 posts)Cha
(296,893 posts)not? It's their damn problem.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Cha
(296,893 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Nice touch, calling the angry millennials whiners after you consistently ignore their concerns.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Thank GAWD this isn't the real world cause right now it would be Pres Romney and WW3. Thank you Lord!
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)ever saw for Hillary in 2008. Oh,the irony.
Cha
(296,893 posts)anything else.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)I hope your realize by now dirty tricks, slimy tactics, smear jobs and name calling is not going endear people to Secretary Clinton.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)But then, there isn't a legion of Hillary supporters carping about not voting for Sanders if he wins the nod. The opposite seems to be the baseline for Berniestas.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)But, I will agree that entitled Hillary may very well win the nomination and then go on lose the general election. Then the liberals and progressives will be blamed. Then after a few election cycles it will be the common wisdom that Hillary lost because she was so radically left-wing and ultra-liberal and the far left had hijacked the Party. That is exactly what they will be saying. I have seen it all before.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)is if liberals and progressives don't vote, or vote for a 3rd party. NOBODY IN THE CLINTON CAMP IS ADVOCATING THAT! OTOH it seems to be a prerequisite for Bernie's supporters.
The biggest delusion you have is believing your own propaganda.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)supporters is not going to convince liberals and progressives of anything or help Hillary in anyway. A number of Hillary's supporters have made it clear that they will not support Sen. Sander and have engaged in tactics that make it hard for them to reverse positions:
Douglas Carpenter (19,801 posts)
129. I pledge to support Hillary if she is the nominee? Do you pledge to support Bernie if he is the nominee?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=868787
-----------
131. Absolutely not
I'm a Democrat. He is NOT a Democrat. I wouldn't vote for him if you held a gun to my head, just like I would never and have never voted for a republican in my 38 years of voting. In fact in the minuscule chance that he was nominated I would never give another red cent to the party, knock doors, or phone bank for Dems.
Not in a million fucking years. And frankly, at least 50% of that feeling could be credited to his supporters who have spent the last several years smearing the shit out of real Democrats.
So no, never, ever, ever would I vote for him. Never.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=868804
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And many cannot vote for a corrupt candidate
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)The opposite is true and you know it
treestar
(82,383 posts)I don't there is anything the Hillary camp can do. It's odd they are also Democrats.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)forward and seek a newer world - not simply hopes to refine the status quo.
I certainly have no reason to hate Hillary. I never met her. It is simply that she is not a social-democrat and would not be supportive of the kind of policies that I am convinced to a moral certainty and beyond any reasonable doubt would be necessary to move the country forward. Is she better than the any of the Republican alternatives? Of course. But I would actually like to see polices enacted that are more than simply less dangerous than Republican policies.
If there was a viable progressive and social-democratic alternative to supporting the Democrats without endangering the possibility of putting some right-wing crazy in power - I would support that instead. But the political system of the United States is not constructed that way.
Once a LaRouche devotee won the Democratic Primary for Lt. Governor of Illinois. Nobody suggested that they were morally bound to support him. On another occasion a KKK, Aryan Nation leader won the Democratic Primary for a U.S. Congress seat in Southern California. Again, nobody suggested that loyal Democrats were obliged to support him. My point being that being a Democrat is not a religion. Everybody has some point where they will not support the Democratic nominee.
Of course Hillary is not that bad and I said before and I'm sure most Sander's supporters agree as is affirmed by polling that if Hillary became the nominee they and I would support her. But this is a primary process and for the first time in decades there is at least the possibility of nominating and perhaps even electing someone who goes beyond simply tweaking the status quo. Hillary is nothing exceptional that way. She is pretty much in the same centrist political sphere that has been dominating the Democratic Party for at least the last three or four decades. I would like to try something different.
treestar
(82,383 posts)and most voters are content with the status quo and with step by step forward progress. The ones most unhappy with the status quo are the right wingers who want all the progress torn down. Fighting them is what we have to do, so tearing down people who are anywhere to the left of the center line is a waste of time.
We could see ourselves going backwards if we are not smart.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)I would prefer Bernie over her the same way I would support Bernie over Vice President Biden or Bernie over Bill Richardson or whoever.
I don't think we really have the time to just tweak the status quo. In many respects we are already going backwards. The situation is already desperate.
Besides without a strong left pushing more radical and immediate changes we have only the center-right and the far right. There is no place to compromise if we simply support policies that are based on the least we can get. The Republicans never worry about pushing too far on the right. They just keep pushing it farther and farther.
Most Republicans I know have the opposite view of Hillary and any mainstream Democratic Party figures. They denounce them as far leftist and radical socialist. Well, of course that is crazy. But if they are as far left as it goes in the American political body politic. Then a political body politic is by default created in which center-right becomes by definition as far left as anyone can go - and no farther.
There is a reason why President Obama said that in the 80's he might have been a moderate Republican and that Richard Nixon was more liberal than him in many ways.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)That is the poly sci definition. The status quo is right wing
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)This OP is a prime example, and we see scores just like it every day
quickesst
(6,280 posts)....republicans.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)To allow any of the Republicans to be elected will bring more Citizens United.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Her supporters cry elections can't be won without it
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Overturn, what is Sanders planning to do?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)That's because she is the corporate candidate
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)That Sanders can't raise enough money to win without embracing it.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)When did it occur to you that you were entitled to peoples' votes?
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)Well, if it's any consolation you remind me of Jar Jar Binks.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=924547
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
This is one of the worst insults I've ever seen! Jar Jar Binks almost single handedly ruined the STAR WARS prequels! No DUer should be compared to this awful, hated, racist character! The universe is a better place without him...
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Dec 19, 2015, 08:59 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Was gonna vote to hide because really, childish personal insults should have no place here, but then I read the tone of the alert and figured it was made in jest so I won't ding the poster.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I'm not sure if K knows Cali is Black, but it's a stupid and childish dig.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given