2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBaucus Untethered by Politics Seeks Path to Tax Rewrite
Max Baucus, declaring himself unconstrained by electoral politics for the first time since coming to Congress in 1975, placed a 20-month clock on his efforts to push a tax-code rewrite through the U.S. Senate.
In announcing that he wont seek a seventh term in 2014, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee said hell concentrate on trying to forge a compromise on a core fiscal issue dividing Democrats and Republicans.
--CLIP
In theory, Baucuss retirement and his renewed focus could improve chances of a tax rewrite that would curb breaks and lower rates. In practice, Baucus is the same lawmaker who has often frustrated Democrats by siding with Republicans, still operating in an environment that smothers bipartisan efforts.
--CLIP
Baucus, 71, has been the top Democrat on the Finance Committee since 2001, giving him sway over taxation, health care and entitlement programs. In that period, he has shepherded some Democratic priorities into law while breaking frequently from his party, drawing praise from Republicans for his willingness to work with them.
MORE...
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-24/baucus-untethered-by-politics-seeks-path-to-tax-rewrite.html
LonePirate
(13,408 posts)We need to remove loopholes and deductions; but we definitely do not need to lower rates.
SharonAnn
(13,771 posts)We definitely don't need lower tax rates, especially not for the well-off.
And we DO need estate taxes or we will be cementing ourselves into an ever larger, ever poorer population with an even fewer, even wealthier class of overlords. And thence, cometh the revolution!
Robb
(39,665 posts)...and couldn't be bothered to cast a "yea" vote for gun control?
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)untethered by politics or not. In fact, that would probably be worse!
Snake.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,795 posts)Considering that his assets are listed $10k to $160k in mostly stocks and mutual funds doesn't say much about his financial savvy. I'm younger then he is and my annual wages were much lower than his congressional salary. Yet, my net worth is higher than his?
He has always been the wrong person for the Finance Committee.
SharonAnn
(13,771 posts)There's no way he has that little after 6 terms as Senator during which time he helped the wealthy and shafted the little guy.
SunSeeker
(51,523 posts)If he had a consience, if he felt untethered by politics, he would have voted for background checks. I don't trust that douchebag for one second.
Wounded Bear
(58,605 posts)we don't have a spending problem. We have a revenue problem.