Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNYTimes Uses News Story to Express Dislike of Danish Welfare State
NYT Uses News Story to Express Dislike of Danish Welfare StateSunday, 21 April 2013 CEPR
The NYT appears to be following the pattern of journalism practiced by the Washington Post in openly editorializing in its news section. Today the news section features a diatribe against the Danish welfare state that is headlined, "Danes Rethink a Welfare State Ample to a Fault." There's not much ambiguity in that one. The piece then proceeds to present a state of statistics that are grossly misleading and excluding other data points that are highly relevant.
The first paragraphs describe the generosity of the welfare state, then we get this ominous warning in the 5th paragraph:
"But Denmarks long-term outlook is troubling. The population is aging, and in many regions of the country people without jobs now outnumber those with them."
Oooooh, scary! Yeah people are living longer in Denmark, that's something that's been happening for a couple of hundred years or so. Like every other wealthy country, people live longer in Denmark than in the United States. While they are projected to continue to see gains in life expectancy and further aging of the population, the increase is actually going to much slower than in the United States.
From 2012 to 2025 the percentage of the Danish population over age 65 is projected to rise from 17.8% to 21.2%, an increase of 3.4 percentage points. By comparison, in the United States the share of the population over age 65 is projected to rise from 13.6% to 18.1%, an increase of 4.5 percentage points over the same period, from a considerably smaller base. The impact of aging on the economy and the government budget will clearly be much larger in the U.S. than Denmark, especially since the government first starts paying for health care for people after they turn age 65 in the United States. (Like every other wealthy country, Denmark has national health insurance.)
.............................more >
http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/nyt-uses-news-story-to-express-dislike-of-danish-welfare-state
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1778 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYTimes Uses News Story to Express Dislike of Danish Welfare State (Original Post)
ErikJ
Apr 2013
OP
unrepentant progress
(611 posts)1. Oh horrors!
A single mom with two kids is getting a whopping $32,000 a year off the dole... Quick, call Captain Austerian! She and her kids must be starved into realizing the error of their ways. Oh, and somebody find a work camp for those kids.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)2. All part of the propaganda campaign against the masses.
Universal healthcare is good.
Daycare for Mother's who work is good.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)3. Yes, the usual whiney projection where economics is involved.
And the usual lack of any historical evidence to support their fatuous arguement that Hobbesian disfunction is somehow better than common effort for the common good.
cprise
(8,445 posts)4. NYT is a corporation like any other, nowadays
Their staff's mode of compensation makes them biased toward Wall St. interests.