Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone besides me tired of the sanctimonious (Original Post) skepticscott Apr 2013 OP
It's an easy way to get a LOT of clicks and shares from tut-tutting Christians. trotsky Apr 2013 #1
The name calling and passive-aggressive taunts are sure signs that reason is winning. cleanhippie Apr 2013 #2
Yes, very. Ron Obvious Apr 2013 #3
+1 cleanhippie Apr 2013 #4
There is a deep irony skepticscott Apr 2013 #9
It seems new because when it was said before, it was suppressed. dimbear Apr 2013 #18
Yes, verily. bravenak Apr 2013 #5
I have been fortunate enough to miss this JNelson6563 Apr 2013 #6
Thanks, Julie..but you deserve better skepticscott Apr 2013 #7
LOL. Iggo Apr 2013 #8
lolz JNelson6563 Apr 2013 #13
Yes, and thank the Goddess libodem Apr 2013 #10
What makes them think their brand of atheism is so much more enlightened, anyway? deucemagnet Apr 2013 #11
We have "brands" of atheism? SwissTony Apr 2013 #12
You have my sympathies! JNelson6563 Apr 2013 #14
You have my sympathies too. SwissTony Apr 2013 #15
Have you not visited the Religion forum yet? deucemagnet Apr 2013 #17
Yes, I visit the Religion forum a couple of times a week. SwissTony Apr 2013 #22
Thank you, God, that I am not like these atheists here!!!! Curmudgeoness Apr 2013 #16
Psst! Wanna get even MORE pissed off? onager Apr 2013 #19
Just makes me want to go eat at Cracker Barrel. defacto7 Apr 2013 #20
Good grief. trotsky Apr 2013 #21
Ain't we all... Buffalo Bull Apr 2013 #23

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
1. It's an easy way to get a LOT of clicks and shares from tut-tutting Christians.
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 11:05 AM
Apr 2013

And the tut-tutting Christians are all too happy to oblige. They can't answer any of the arguments presented, so the "tone" one is all they have left. They embrace it.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
2. The name calling and passive-aggressive taunts are sure signs that reason is winning.
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 11:20 AM
Apr 2013

Too many have had their irrational nonsense protected and catered to, and are now waking up to the sober reality that the world is changing. Irrational beliefs are on the way out, and that scares the crap out of some.

But here in DU, when we get called names, or an OP gets posted for the sole purpose of calling out the most vocal of us with a loaded term like "evangelical atheist", I take it as a sign that they have nothing left. Nothing but name calling. And that makes me happy.

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
3. Yes, very.
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 11:39 AM
Apr 2013

This supposed movement of atheists anxious to distance themselves from Dawkins and other freethinkers is extremely tiresome. I find nothing strident in the new atheists, but their willingness to simply express what we're all thinking is getting tarred with silly labels like bigotry and islamophobia all too frequently lately.

There's nothing 'new' about the 'new atheists', other than that we're being heard for the first time. And it's apparently working.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
9. There is a deep irony
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 12:43 PM
Apr 2013

Largely unrecognized by these types, in the fact that one of the main reasons they even have their cutesy little columns on Huff Post or Salon, and can stick their heads out of their hidey-holes, is that the stigma of being an atheist has been greatly reduced, in no small part due the efforts of much braver people who have gone before them (and who they now upbraid for being too "strident" or "militant&quot .

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
18. It seems new because when it was said before, it was suppressed.
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 07:20 PM
Apr 2013

At least that's the reason so many atheist heroes are unknown today IMHO.

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
6. I have been fortunate enough to miss this
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 12:25 PM
Apr 2013

I catch it sometimes here but haven't seen much of this myself. Then again I don't spend much time in the usual places such nonsense would tend to crop up.

I do find sanctimonious anything (atheist, Christian, whatever) very annoying. I try to remember such people tend to be horribly insecure and crave the approval of others, even strangers. That way I feel more pity then anger.

Poor sods.

Good OP and, as usual, good discussion. Have I told you AAers lately that I love youse guys?

Yeah, I do.

Julie

libodem

(19,288 posts)
10. Yes, and thank the Goddess
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 01:04 PM
Apr 2013

My belief system has the superior qualifications to out shine your, values and beliefs, and your rational and logic.

Only, messin' with ya, it's a joke, son.

deucemagnet

(4,549 posts)
11. What makes them think their brand of atheism is so much more enlightened, anyway?
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 02:04 PM
Apr 2013

Don't you think honesty shows more respect to the religious than a lollipop and a pat on the head?

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)
12. We have "brands" of atheism?
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 02:59 PM
Apr 2013

I thought atheism was just a lack of belief in god(s).

Do we also have brands of non-stamp collectors?

I don't actually see that (e.g.) Dawkins is at all "offensive". He's always calm, willing to listen, never rants. And he's honest.

Should honesty show more respect to people who believe in Nessie than a lollipop and a pat on the head? We should show respect to people and tolerate their beliefs.

Tolerate, not respect.

And, by the way, they don't respect ours. Try having a JW for a sister.

And try being an atheist blogger in Bangladesh.

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
14. You have my sympathies!
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 03:06 PM
Apr 2013

I am very familiar with the whole JW schtick, it's one of the more obnoxious that I know of.

Julie

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)
15. You have my sympathies too.
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 03:27 PM
Apr 2013

For years, my sister and her husband (my BIL, obviously) would start a conversation with me and it would turn into a "Why don't you believe in God?" schtick. (I like that word - is it Yiddish? Yiddish has some wonderful words).

One day, my BIL started talking to me about cricket (the game). I was amazed. I love cricket, but to the best of my knowledge he had zero interest in the game. I thought this was brilliant. But then of course he started saying things like "Don't you think God...".

Oh, God.

deucemagnet

(4,549 posts)
17. Have you not visited the Religion forum yet?
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 07:11 PM
Apr 2013

Apparently there are many types of atheists. Militant atheists and fundamental atheists. Atheism+ atheists, strong atheists, weak atheist, and faitheists. And, per the OP, atheists that believe that their behavior is superior to other atheists.

BTW, although you make good points about Dawkins, your Nessie analogy is faulty. Belief in Nessie neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg, but belief in religion impacts my government's policies and my daily life, and for that reason deserves neither my respect nor tolerance. Tolerance of such a thing merely enables religious privilege.

Sorry about the intolerance that you are experiencing.

SwissTony

(2,560 posts)
22. Yes, I visit the Religion forum a couple of times a week.
Wed Apr 17, 2013, 10:24 AM
Apr 2013

By "tolerance", I meant tolerance of individuals' beliefs. It pisses me off that churches have tax-free status. Yeah, that's costing me money even though I'm not in the game. I'm even more pissed off that various companies receive government subsidies while making massive profits (e.g. the oil and tobacco companies if the intertubes are to be believed).

By the way, I don't personally experience any intolerance. I live in The Netherlands and my status as atheist is of less importance here than the football (soccer) team I support. But I appreciate your kind thoughts and offer the same in return.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
16. Thank you, God, that I am not like these atheists here!!!!
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 06:38 PM
Apr 2013

Just kidding....you guys rock. I have learned a lot from you and have gotten braver about my atheism.

Although I have to say that I have no idea what you are talking about----that makes absolutely no sense. I have not seen this before, and if I did, I would have to call them on it.

onager

(9,356 posts)
19. Psst! Wanna get even MORE pissed off?
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 08:16 PM
Apr 2013

First, results of a quick Google search: new atheists strident = About 3,090,000 results

Hmmm. So a lot of people are copying from the same exam paper, it seems...

One search hit was this article, published 4 days ago, by Kimberly Winston.

But before we check out Winston's latest article on atheism, let's wander over to Amazon and see what books she might have written about atheism, religion in general, etc...

Bead One, Pray Too: A Guide to Making and Using Prayer Beads by Kimberly Winston(Apr 1, 2008)

Fabric of Faith: A Guide to the Prayer Quilt Ministry by Kimberly Winston(Jun 1, 2006)

Faith Beyond Faith Healing: Finding Hope After Shattered Dreams by Kimberly Winston(Apr 2002)


Oh...

And here's the article:

Atheists, the Next Generation: Unbelief Moves Further into the Mainstream By Kimberly Winston - Apr 12, 2013

She starts off OK, making a point y'all have covered already - thanks largely to the Gnu Atheists, atheism is not quite as hated as it once was. Meaning we may be ranked slightly above child molesters now, but probably still somewhere beneath Communists:

What’s changed? For one thing, in part due to the books of the New Atheists, nonbelief has become less stigmatized.

Fair enough. But then she drops this giant steaming load:

One thing has not changed. Just as the New Atheists were all white, male, and, with the exception of Harris, middle-aged, the current crop of authors is mostly white and almost exclusively male.

AAAAHHHHHHH! Not true and never was. "ALL white, male and...middle-aged?" The ironic thing is, she goes to write about some well-known atheists who are not male - like Greta Christina.

And in previous articles, WINSTON HER DAMN SELF has written about atheism making inroads into the Black community. I'd love for her to run that "all white" line past James Onen, head of Freethought Kampala. In Uganda.

Grrrr...whole article here. Some of the comments are great:

http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/religion/article/56789-atheists-the-next-generation-unbelief-moves-further-into-the-mainstream.html

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
21. Good grief.
Wed Apr 17, 2013, 07:11 AM
Apr 2013

Nice dissection. But remember, she says the things that people who think "New Atheists" are icky, white, and male WANT TO HEAR.

Buffalo Bull

(138 posts)
23. Ain't we all...
Wed Apr 17, 2013, 03:23 PM
Apr 2013


...Both tired of the sanctimonious and are the sanctimonious.
I'm not judging you.
It's just an insight gained from retrospective self examination.
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Anyone besides me tired o...