Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumRoger Ebert Would Have Given His Obit Cartoons Two Thumbs Down
Hemant Mehta (Friendly Atheist) nails it...
Im not sure that Roger Ebert, an outspoken secular humanist who didnt believe in an afterlife, would have appreciated being depicted in heaven with Gene Siskel, no less. They were co-workers who disliked each other, not soul mates.
Finally, some honesty. Bors drawing is unique, unlike the other cartoons. I only wish it were longer!
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2013/04/10/roger-ebert-would-have-given-his-obit-cartoons-two-thumbs-down/
progressoid
(49,972 posts)Like he and Gene are watching movies in heaven etc.
Must remember to stop reading comments by the general public. It's depressing.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)that tributes, memorials, funerals, etc. are for the living, not the dead... who are well, dead. So if that's how they want to remember him, who am I to disagree.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)then did they really know who he was as a person in the first place?
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)Roger Ebert died? Let's picture him meeting Gene Siskel in heaven giving each other two thumbs up. It's just so mindless.
onager
(9,356 posts)I bet they'd get a review similar to Ebert's smackdown of Vincent Gallo's movie "The Brown Bunny:"
"I had a colonoscopy once, and they let me watch it on TV. It was more entertaining than 'The Brown Bunny.'"
Or Ebert's treatment of Rob Schneider and his epic cinematic achievement "Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo."
Patrick Goldstein gutted that turkey in the L.A. TIMES. Schneider wrote Goldstein a furious letter/press release, basically saying Goldstein was a nobody and hadn't even won a Pulitzer Prize or anything. Ergo, Goldstein was "unqualified" to review a masterpiece like "Deuce Bigblow."
Ebert wrote to Schneider: "As chance would have it, I have won the Pulitzer Prize, and so I am qualified. Speaking in my official capacity as a Pulitzer Prize winner, Mr. Schneider, your movie sucks."