Science
Related: About this forumThe Mind of a Con Man
By YUDHIJIT BHATTACHARJEE
Published: April 26, 2013
One summer night in 2011, a tall, 40-something professor named Diederik Stapel stepped out of his elegant brick house in the Dutch city of Tilburg to visit a friend around the corner. It was close to midnight, but his colleague Marcel Zeelenberg had called and texted Stapel that evening to say that he wanted to see him about an urgent matter. The two had known each other since the early 90s, when they were Ph.D. students at the University of Amsterdam; now both were psychologists at Tilburg University. In 2010, Stapel became dean of the universitys School of Social and Behavioral Sciences and Zeelenberg head of the social psychology department. Stapel and his wife, Marcelle, had supported Zeelenberg through a difficult divorce a few years earlier. As he approached Zeelenbergs door, Stapel wondered if his colleague was having problems with his new girlfriend.
Zeelenberg, a stocky man with a shaved head, led Stapel into his living room. Whats up? Stapel asked, settling onto a couch. Two graduate students had made an accusation, Zeelenberg explained. His eyes began to fill with tears. They suspect you have been committing research fraud.
Stapel was an academic star in the Netherlands and abroad, the author of several well-regarded studies on human attitudes and behavior. That spring, he published a widely publicized study in Science about an experiment done at the Utrecht train station showing that a trash-filled environment tended to bring out racist tendencies in individuals. And just days earlier, he received more media attention for a study indicating that eating meat made people selfish and less social.
His enemies were targeting him because of changes he initiated as dean, Stapel replied, quoting a Dutch proverb about high trees catching a lot of wind. When Zeelenberg challenged him with specifics to explain why certain facts and figures he reported in different studies appeared to be identical Stapel promised to be more careful in the future. As Zeelenberg pressed him, Stapel grew increasingly agitated.
more
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/diederik-stapels-audacious-academic-fraud.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Although it was sad to see such an intricate fraud, it was encouraging to see his university pull the plug on him so thoroughly.
caraher
(6,278 posts)One of the biggest fraudsters of all time, Jan Hendrick Schön, was a master:
Yet another reason to be the most skeptical of things that reinforce your beliefs.
siligut
(12,272 posts)Kind of sad really.